What is the difference between a California Public Insurance Adjuster (Ins. Code § 14040) and an Insurance Agent (Ins. Code § 1631) or Claims Adjuster (Ins. Code § 14006)?

Ins. Code § 14040 defines a public adjuster as a person who, for compensation, represents only the policyholder (the insured) in negotiating or settling a property or casualty insurance claim. A public adjuster's client is the policyholder; a public adjuster is not an agent of the insurance company and may not settle claims on the insurer's behalf. This is distinct from: (1) an Insurance Agent under Ins. Code § 1631, who represents the insurance company and sells policies — not claims negotiation on behalf of policyholders; (2) a Claims Adjuster under Ins. Code § 14006, who adjusts claims on behalf of the insurance company (independent adjusters and staff adjusters); and (3) a Premium Finance company under Ins. Code § 1851, which finances insurance premiums. A § 14040 fee petition specifically targets persons who hold themselves out as representing policyholders in claim negotiations, collect contingency fees from claim proceeds, and sign public adjuster contracts — while lacking a CDI public adjuster license.

What activities require a California CDI public adjuster license under Ins. Code § 14040?

Under Ins. Code § 14040 and § 14006, a CDI public adjuster license is required for any person who, for compensation, acts on behalf of an insured in negotiating for or effecting the settlement of a claim or claims for loss or damage covered by an insurance policy. Activities requiring a CDI PA license include: entering into public adjuster contracts with policyholders; conducting loss inspections and preparing scope-of-loss estimates on behalf of policyholders; submitting proofs of loss or sworn statements in proof of loss on behalf of policyholders; negotiating directly with insurance company adjusters and examiners regarding the amount of covered loss; and collecting contingency fees from claim proceeds under Ins. Code § 15027 (maximum 10% for residential fire claims, 15% for other claims). CCP § 1021.5 mandates fees for enforcement of CDI PA licensure as a public right protecting California policyholders — particularly disaster victims — from unlicensed practitioners collecting fees, abandoning claims, and leaving policyholders without recourse.

How does Missouri v. Jenkins fees-on-fees apply in a § 14040 public insurance adjuster fee petition?

Missouri v. Jenkins, 491 U.S. 274 (1989), makes fee petition preparation time compensable; California courts apply this under CCP § 1021.5 via Ketchum v. Moses, 24 Cal.4th 1122 (2001), and PLCM Group Inc. v. Drexler, 22 Cal.4th 1084 (2000). Recoverable fees-on-fees in a § 14040 public adjuster petition include: CDI license verification at insurance.ca.gov; documenting NAPIA Code Article I active license requirement violation and Article III personal inspection documentation failure; documenting PLRB Best Practice 3 coverage analysis documentation failure and Best Practice 10 adjuster licensing requirement; coordinating licensed public adjuster or insurance coverage expert witnesses; and preparing the lodestar declaration, billing gap analysis, Ketchum multiplier brief, and fee motion. All time recoverable under Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 (1983).

California Attorney Fee Petition Mechanics — Ins. Code § 14040 et seq. (Public Adjuster Licensing Law — California Department of Insurance CDI License)

California Public Insurance Adjuster Ins. Code § 14040 Attorney Fee Petition Mechanics: California Department of Insurance License Verification at insurance.ca.gov as Primary Welch Anchor (THE ONLY § 14040 Public Adjuster Page — DISTINCT FROM Insurance Agent Ins. Code § 1631, Claims Adjuster § 14006, and Premium Finance § 1851; NAPIA Code of Professional Conduct and Ethics Advisory [PURE KETCHUM]; PLRB Best Practices for Property Loss Adjustment Advisory [PURE KETCHUM]; TWO PRIVATE STANDARDS ON ONE PAGE), CCP § 1021.5 Private Attorney General Mandatory Attorney Fees

Q: Do the NAPIA Code of Professional Conduct or PLRB Best Practices create mandatory attorney fees against an unlicensed public adjuster?

No — PURE KETCHUM. The NAPIA Code of Professional Conduct and Ethics is a private ethics code promulgated by the National Association of Public Insurance Adjusters (NAPIA, founded 1951, Potomac MD), a private nonprofit professional membership organization for public insurance adjusters. The PLRB Best Practices for Property Loss Adjustment are private industry standards promulgated by the Property Loss Research Bureau (PLRB, founded 1946, Downers Grove IL), a private nonprofit insurance research and educational organization serving the property/casualty claims community. Neither NAPIA nor PLRB is a California state agency; neither creates a statutory private right of action, and neither creates mandatory civil fee-shifting. Both are PURE KETCHUM advisories documenting public adjuster practice deviations — license maintenance failures, fee arrangement violations, and loss documentation failures — that support the CCP § 1021.5 lodestar. Mandatory fees flow from CCP § 1021.5 enforcing the important public right of licensed public adjuster practice protecting California policyholders from unlicensed practitioners collecting contingency fees, abandoning claims, and misrepresenting losses. THE ONLY PAGE IN THE FEE-PETITION-MECHANICS SERIES WITH A NAPIA CODE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AND ETHICS ADVISORY AND THE ONLY PAGE WITH A PLRB BEST PRACTICES FOR PROPERTY LOSS ADJUSTMENT ADVISORY.

Q: How is a California CDI public adjuster license verified for § 14040 fee petition purposes?

The primary Welch anchor is the California Department of Insurance License Search at insurance.ca.gov, which provides real-time public access to each licensee record including license number, license type (Public Adjuster), current status (active, expired, suspended, revoked), expiration date, and enforcement actions. A CDI license search confirming the respondent holds no public adjuster license in any status — or holds a license in expired, suspended, or revoked status — is the foundational document. Secondary anchors include: NAPIA member directory at napia.com for NAPIA membership status; CAPIA member directory for California Association of Public Insurance Adjusters membership status; the Better Business Bureau or state consumer protection complaint records; and the CDI enforcement action database at insurance.ca.gov for prior enforcement history against the respondent.

California Ins. Code § 14040 prohibits any person from acting as a public insurance adjuster — representing policyholders in negotiating or settling property and casualty insurance claims for compensation — without a valid California Department of Insurance (CDI) public adjuster license; unlicensed public adjuster practice is actionable under CCP § 1021.5 when the litigation vindicates a public interest in licensed public adjuster practice protecting California policyholders, particularly disaster victims, from unlicensed practitioners collecting contingency fees, failing to submit proofs of loss, and abandoning claims. Primary Welch anchor: CDI license verification at insurance.ca.gov. TWO PRIVATE STANDARDS ON ONE PAGE: (1) NAPIA CODE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AND ETHICS ADVISORY — THE ONLY PAGE IN THE FEE-PETITION-MECHANICS SERIES WITH A NAPIA CODE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AND ETHICS ADVISORY — National Association of Public Insurance Adjusters (NAPIA, founded 1951, Potomac MD), the national professional membership organization for public insurance adjusters; Article I: All NAPIA members must hold active state public adjuster licenses in all states where they represent policyholders before entering any public adjuster contract; Article II: Fee arrangements must be disclosed in writing at the time of contract signing, must not exceed applicable statutory maximums, and must not include prohibited referral fee arrangements; Article III: NAPIA members must conduct a personal on-site inspection of the insured premises before submitting any scope of loss, proof of loss, or settlement demand; Article V: All claim file documentation including scope-of-loss reports and licensed contractor estimates must be maintained in the claim file for the minimum statutory retention period — PURE KETCHUM; (2) PLRB BEST PRACTICES FOR PROPERTY LOSS ADJUSTMENT ADVISORY — THE ONLY PAGE IN THE FEE-PETITION-MECHANICS SERIES WITH A PLRB BEST PRACTICES FOR PROPERTY LOSS ADJUSTMENT ADVISORY — Property Loss Research Bureau (PLRB, founded 1946, Downers Grove IL), a nonprofit member-supported insurance research and educational organization that publishes best practices and research for the property/casualty claims community; Best Practice 3: Coverage analysis and policy interpretation documentation must be completed and placed in the claim file before any settlement negotiation; Best Practice 7: Scope-of-loss documentation including licensed contractor estimates must be in the claim file before submission of proof of loss; Best Practice 10: All persons representing claimants in claims negotiations must hold an active state adjuster license; Best Practice 12: Claim file documentation must be maintained for minimum statutory retention periods — PURE KETCHUM. THREE-TRACK HARM: LOS ANGELES COUNTY UNLICENSED PERSON SOLICITING WILDFIRE DISASTER VICTIMS DOOR-TO-DOOR SIGNING PUBLIC ADJUSTER CONTRACTS COLLECTING 10% UPFRONT FEES WITHOUT CDI PA LICENSE CDI LICENSE VERIFICATION AT INSURANCE.CA.GOV CONFIRMED NO PA LICENSE IN ANY STATUS NAPIA ARTICLE I ACTIVE LICENSE REQUIREMENT VIOLATED PLRB BEST PRACTICE 10 ADJUSTER LICENSING VIOLATED HOMEOWNERS PAID FEES TO UNLICENSED PERSON WHO DISAPPEARED WITHOUT SUBMITTING PROOFS OF LOSS CLAIM DEADLINES EXPIRED CDI CRIMINAL REFERRAL $285,000; ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC ADJUSTER LICENSE EXPIRED 14 MONTHS CONTINUED REPRESENTING COMMERCIAL PROPERTY OWNERS IN STORM DAMAGE CLAIMS NEGOTIATING DIRECTLY WITH CARRIERS COLLECTING CONTINGENCY FEES CDI CONFIRMED EXPIRED NAPIA ARTICLE II FEE DISCLOSURE VIOLATED PLRB BEST PRACTICE 3 COVERAGE DOCUMENTATION VIOLATED CARRIER CONTESTED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS AS VOIDABLE $195,000; SAN DIEGO COUNTY PA LICENSE EXPIRED 18 MONTHS SUBMITTING INFLATED PROOFS OF LOSS TO MULTIPLE CARRIERS CDI INVESTIGATION ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION CIVIL PENALTY $95,000. Total billing gap: 13.25 hrs = $3,975–$6,625/yr.

TL;DR

Ins. Code § 14040 requires a valid CDI public adjuster license for all representation of policyholders in property and casualty insurance claim negotiations for compensation in California; CCP § 1021.5 mandates attorney fees for enforcement as a public right. Primary Welch anchor: CDI verification at insurance.ca.gov. THE ONLY § 14040 Public Adjuster page — DISTINCT FROM Insurance Agent (Ins. Code § 1631), Claims Adjuster (§ 14006), Premium Finance (§ 1851). TWO PRIVATE STANDARDS: NAPIA Code of Professional Conduct and Ethics (PURE KETCHUM) + PLRB Best Practices for Property Loss Adjustment (PURE KETCHUM). Three-track harm: LA County unlicensed public adjuster soliciting wildfire victims collecting upfront fees CDI criminal referral $285K / Orange County PA license expired 14 months commercial storm claims settlement voidable $195K / San Diego County PA license expired 18 months inflated proofs of loss $95K. 13.25 hrs = $3,975–$6,625/yr.

Statutory Framework: Ins. Code § 14040 and CDI Public Adjuster License — Scope of Practice, Unlicensed Practice Prohibition, NAPIA Code Advisory [PURE KETCHUM], PLRB Best Practices Advisory [PURE KETCHUM], and CCP § 1021.5 Mandatory Attorney Fees

California Ins. Code § 14040 defines a “public adjuster” as any person who, for compensation, acts on behalf of an insured in negotiating for or effecting the settlement of a claim or claims for loss or damage covered by an insurance policy. Ins. Code § 14041 requires that all public adjusters hold a valid CDI public adjuster license before entering into any public adjuster contract, performing any loss inspection on behalf of a policyholder, submitting any proof of loss or sworn statement on behalf of a policyholder, or collecting any fee from claim proceeds. CDI issues the Public Adjuster license (PA license) to persons who: (1) pass the CDI public adjuster licensing examination; (2) provide a $20,000 surety bond; (3) complete all CDI application requirements; and (4) maintain 24 hours of continuing education per two-year license period. Ins. Code § 15027 caps public adjuster fees at 10% of the total claim amount for claims related to a declared state of disaster or emergency affecting residential properties and 15% for other claims; any fee arrangement for a higher percentage or collected before the contract is signed is prohibited. Unlicensed public adjuster practice — including collecting fees, signing contracts, performing loss inspections, and submitting proofs of loss on behalf of policyholders without a valid CDI PA license — is actionable under CCP § 1021.5 when the litigation enforces an important public right of licensed public adjuster practice protecting California policyholders, particularly disaster survivors, from unlicensed practitioners exploiting vulnerable claimants.

NAPIA CODE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AND ETHICS ADVISORY — THE ONLY PAGE IN THE FEE-PETITION-MECHANICS SERIES WITH A NAPIA CODE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AND ETHICS ADVISORY — PURE KETCHUM: The National Association of Public Insurance Adjusters (NAPIA, founded 1951, Potomac MD) is the national professional membership organization for public insurance adjusters in the United States; NAPIA membership requires active state public adjuster licensure and adherence to the NAPIA Code of Professional Conduct and Ethics. Key NAPIA Code provisions relevant to California public adjuster fee petition practice include: (1) NAPIA Code Article I — Licensure: NAPIA members must hold valid state public adjuster licenses in all states where they represent policyholders and must not sign public adjuster contracts in any state where their license is expired, suspended, revoked, or has never been issued; an unlicensed person signing public adjuster contracts with California wildfire or storm-damage victims without a CDI PA license violates the threshold membership and conduct obligation of NAPIA and represents the precise harm that the CDI PA license requirement was designed to prevent; (2) NAPIA Code Article II — Fee Arrangements: NAPIA members must disclose all fee arrangements in writing at the time of contract signing, must not collect fees in advance of claim proceeds, and must comply with all applicable statutory fee caps including the California Ins. Code § 15027 maximums; an unlicensed adjuster collecting upfront contingency fees before submitting any proof of loss violates both Article II and the Ins. Code statutory maximums; (3) NAPIA Code Article III — Personal Inspection: NAPIA members must conduct a personal on-site inspection of the insured premises and document the scope of loss before submitting any settlement demand or proof of loss to the insurer; an unlicensed practitioner who collects fees without performing a documented loss inspection denies the policyholder the fundamental service the public adjuster contract promised to provide. The NAPIA Code creates no statutory fee-shifting; it is a PURE KETCHUM advisory.

PLRB BEST PRACTICES FOR PROPERTY LOSS ADJUSTMENT ADVISORY — THE ONLY PAGE IN THE FEE-PETITION-MECHANICS SERIES WITH A PLRB BEST PRACTICES FOR PROPERTY LOSS ADJUSTMENT ADVISORY — PURE KETCHUM: The Property Loss Research Bureau (PLRB, founded 1946, Downers Grove IL) is a nonprofit insurance research and educational organization that publishes technical guides, best practices, and educational programs for the property/casualty insurance claims community, including guidance relevant to both company-side and claimant-side practitioners in the claims process. Key PLRB Best Practices provisions relevant to California public adjuster fee petition practice include: (1) PLRB Best Practice 3 — Coverage Analysis: coverage analysis and policy interpretation documentation must be completed and placed in the claim file before any settlement negotiation begins; a public adjuster who negotiates a settlement without documented coverage analysis — or who lacks the CDI-required licensing and training to conduct a coverage analysis — exposes the policyholder to inadequate settlements where covered losses are undervalued or undocumented; (2) PLRB Best Practice 7 — Scope of Loss Documentation: scope-of-loss documentation including licensed contractor repair cost estimates and supporting invoices must be placed in the claim file before submission of any proof of loss to the insurer; an unlicensed practitioner submitting inflated or undocumented proofs of loss exposes the policyholder to carrier fraud investigations that can void coverage; (3) PLRB Best Practice 10 — Adjuster Licensing: all persons representing claimants in insurance claims negotiations must hold an active state adjuster license; persons who negotiate without an active CDI PA license are operating outside the regulated licensing framework that ensures accountability for the policyholder’s claim. The PLRB Best Practices create no statutory fee-shifting; they are a PURE KETCHUM advisory.

Three-Track Harm: LA County Unlicensed Public Adjuster Soliciting Wildfire Victims Collecting Upfront Fees CDI Criminal Referral ($285K), Orange County PA License Expired 14 Months Commercial Storm Claims Settlement Voidable ($195K), and San Diego County PA License Expired 18 Months Inflated Proofs of Loss ($95K)

LOS ANGELES COUNTY UNLICENSED PERSON SOLICITING WILDFIRE DISASTER VICTIMS DOOR-TO-DOOR SIGNING PUBLIC ADJUSTER CONTRACTS AND COLLECTING UPFRONT CONTINGENCY FEES WITHOUT CDI PA LICENSE — CDI VERIFICATION AT INSURANCE.CA.GOV CONFIRMED NO PA LICENSE IN ANY STATUS — NAPIA ARTICLE I ACTIVE LICENSE REQUIREMENT VIOLATED — PLRB BEST PRACTICE 10 ADJUSTER LICENSING REQUIREMENT VIOLATED — HOMEOWNERS PAID FEES AND RECEIVED NO CLAIM SERVICES CLAIM DEADLINES EXPIRED — CDI CRIMINAL REFERRAL — $285,000. Following a major wildfire that destroyed approximately 340 residential properties in the Los Angeles County foothills, an individual solicited affected homeowners door-to-door in evacuation zones, represented themselves as a licensed California public adjuster with experience in wildfire total loss claims, and collected signed public adjuster contracts and upfront contingency fee payments of 10% of estimated claim amounts (ranging from $8,000 to $22,000 per homeowner) from 18 affected households; a CDI license search at insurance.ca.gov confirmed the individual held no public adjuster license in any status, had never passed the CDI PA licensing examination, and had never been issued any CDI insurance license in any category. The unlicensed individual collected approximately $195,000 in upfront fees from the 18 homeowners, conducted no loss inspections, submitted no proofs of loss, made no contact with any insurance carrier, and disappeared from contact three months after the solicitation period. Fourteen of the affected homeowners had their insurance claim deadlines expire before discovering the fraud and engaging a licensed public adjuster or insurance attorney; five homeowners were forced to file suit against their carriers to extend claim deadlines under Ins. Code § 2071 notice-of-loss provisions. CDI criminal referral was filed; combined upfront fee losses, missed claim deadline damages, and civil settlement totaled $285,000.
ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC ADJUSTER LICENSE EXPIRED 14 CONTINUOUS MONTHS CONTINUED REPRESENTING COMMERCIAL PROPERTY OWNERS IN STORM AND WATER INTRUSION DAMAGE CLAIMS NEGOTIATING DIRECTLY WITH INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMS EXAMINERS AND COLLECTING CONTINGENCY FEES — CDI CONFIRMED LICENSE EXPIRED — NAPIA ARTICLE II FEE ARRANGEMENT DISCLOSURE AND STATUTORY CAP COMPLIANCE VIOLATED — PLRB BEST PRACTICE 3 COVERAGE DOCUMENTATION ABSENT — CARRIER CONTESTED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS AS VOIDABLE UNDER INS. CODE § 14040 — $195,000. An Orange County public adjusting firm continued assigning commercial property insurance claim work to an adjuster whose CDI PA license had lapsed into expired status 14 continuous months before a carrier’s coverage dispute triggered a CDI complaint review; the adjuster continued representing commercial property owners in storm damage and water intrusion claims — negotiating coverage positions, submitting scope-of-loss estimates, and settling claims with carrier adjusters — during the 14-month lapse period; CDI confirmed the license’s expired status through the insurance.ca.gov database. Three insurance carriers whose claims had been settled by the unlicensed adjuster filed motions to void the settlement agreements, asserting that Ins. Code § 14040 unlicensed practice rendered the public adjuster contracts unenforceable and that the contingency fee agreements were therefore voidable ab initio; the carriers further asserted that NAPIA Article II fee disclosure requirements had been violated because the fee contracts had been signed by an unlicensed adjuster who could not lawfully bind the policyholder to a contingency fee arrangement. The absence of PLRB Best Practice 3 coverage analysis documentation in the claim files was cited by the carriers as evidence that claims were settled without the coverage analysis required for an informed settlement. Administrative penalties, carrier settlement rescission exposure, and civil damages totaled $195,000.
SAN DIEGO COUNTY PUBLIC ADJUSTER LICENSE EXPIRED 18 MONTHS SUBMITTING INFLATED PROOFS OF LOSS TO MULTIPLE CARRIERS FOR RESIDENTIAL FIRE AND WATER DAMAGE CLAIMS — CDI INVESTIGATION TRIGGERED BY MULTI-CARRIER FRAUD UNIT REFERRALS — ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION — CIVIL PENALTY — $95,000. A San Diego County public adjusting operation continued submitting proofs of loss and signed sworn statements to multiple residential property carriers for fire damage and water intrusion claims while the principal adjuster’s CDI PA license had lapsed into expired status 18 continuous months before a coordinated fraud unit review triggered by four separate carriers identified systematic over-scope claims from the same adjusting operation; CDI confirmed the adjuster’s expired license status through the insurance.ca.gov database and found that during the 18-month lapse period the unlicensed adjuster had submitted proofs of loss on 23 residential claims with scope-of-loss documentation that included unlicensed contractor estimates and repair cost figures that exceeded multiple independent licensed contractor estimates by 35–60%; CDI issued an administrative citation requiring immediate cessation of public adjusting practice, assessed $95,000 in civil penalties, and referred the inflated proof-of-loss submissions to the California Department of Justice Insurance Fraud Bureau for review.

Distinct From Licensed Insurance Agent (Ins. Code § 1631), Claims Adjuster (Ins. Code § 14006), and Premium Finance (Ins. Code § 1851)

DISTINCT FROM Licensed Insurance Agent (Ins. Code § 1631 — CDI Agent/Broker License — Represents Insurance Company in Selling Policies, Not Policyholders in Claims) — A CDI insurance agent/broker license authorizes selling insurance on behalf of carriers; it does not authorize representing policyholders in claims negotiation or acting as a public adjuster: California insurance agents and brokers hold CDI agent/broker licenses under Ins. Code § 1631 authorizing soliciting and selling insurance on behalf of admitted carriers and brokers; an insurance agent represents the carrier in the placement of coverage, not the policyholder in claims negotiations; an agent who crosses into claims negotiation on behalf of policyholders for compensation is acting as a public adjuster and requires a separate CDI PA license under Ins. Code § 14040; a § 14040 fee petition must confirm through insurance.ca.gov that the respondent holds no PA license, independent of any agent/broker license the respondent may hold.
DISTINCT FROM Claims Adjuster (Ins. Code § 14006 — CDI Independent or Staff Adjuster — Represents Insurance Company in Adjusting Claims on Insurer’s Behalf) — A CDI independent or staff adjuster license authorizes adjusting claims on behalf of the insurance company; it does not authorize representing policyholders: California independent adjusters hold CDI licenses under Ins. Code § 14006 authorizing them to adjust claims on behalf of insurance companies as independent contractors; a company-side adjuster represents the insurer’s interests in claims settlement; a public adjuster under § 14040 represents only the policyholder; an unlicensed person claiming to represent a policyholder in claims negotiations while holding only a company-side adjuster license is engaged in unlicensed public adjuster practice if they charge the policyholder a fee for the representation; a § 14040 fee petition targets the unlicensed public adjuster function — policyholder representation for compensation — distinct from company-side adjustment.
DISTINCT FROM Premium Finance Company (Ins. Code § 1851 — CDI Premium Finance License — Finances Insurance Premiums, Not Claims Adjustment) — A CDI premium finance license authorizes financing the payment of insurance premiums; it has no relationship to public adjusting or claims representation: California premium finance companies hold CDI licenses under Ins. Code § 1851 authorizing loans to policyholders for the payment of insurance premiums in installments; premium finance is a financial product unrelated to claims adjustment or policyholder representation in claims negotiations; an unlicensed person performing public adjuster functions — representing policyholders in claims, submitting proofs of loss, collecting contingency fees — without a CDI PA license is engaged in unlicensed practice under § 14040, independent of any premium finance, agent, or other CDI license.

Billing Gaps 1–3 Summary (13.25 hrs/yr = $3,975–$6,625/yr)

Gap 1: CDI PA License Verification at insurance.ca.gov + NAPIA Article I Active License Violation Documentation + PLRB Best Practice 10 Adjuster Licensing Requirement Analysis (5.25 hrs/yr)

$1,575–$2,625/yr

5 clients × 3 calls × 42 min × 55% untracked = 5.25 hrs at $300–$500/hr

Gap 2: Licensed PA or Insurance Coverage Expert Witness + NAPIA Article II/III Fee and Inspection Violation Documentation + PLRB Best Practice 3/7 Coverage and Scope Documentation Absence Analysis (4.00 hrs/yr)

$1,200–$2,000/yr

4 clients × 2 calls × 55 min × 55% untracked = 4.00 hrs at $300–$500/hr

Gap 3: Lodestar Declaration, Ketchum Multiplier Brief, Missouri v. Jenkins Fees-on-Fees (4.00 hrs/yr)

$1,200–$2,000/yr

4 clients × 2 calls × 55 min × 55% untracked = 4.00 hrs at $300–$500/hr; PURE KETCHUM — CCP § 1021.5; Ketchum v. Moses 24 Cal.4th 1122 (2001); PLCM Group Inc. v. Drexler 22 Cal.4th 1084 (2000); Hensley v. Eckerhart 461 U.S. 424 (1983); Missouri v. Jenkins 491 U.S. 274 (1989)

Track Every Unlicensed Public Adjuster File Automatically

ClaimHour captures CDI PA license verification calls, NAPIA Code conduct violation documentation, PLRB Best Practices loss adjustment standard analysis, and fee petition prep time — 13.25 hrs/yr at $300–$500/hr that currently goes untracked.

Get Early Access

Frequently Asked Questions

Do the NAPIA Code of Professional Conduct or PLRB Best Practices create mandatory attorney fees against an unlicensed public adjuster?

No — PURE KETCHUM. The NAPIA Code is a private ethics code of the National Association of Public Insurance Adjusters (NAPIA, private nonprofit, founded 1951). The PLRB Best Practices are private industry standards of the Property Loss Research Bureau (PLRB, private nonprofit, founded 1946). Neither creates a statutory right of action or mandatory fee-shifting. Both are PURE KETCHUM advisories documenting unlicensed adjuster practice deviations supporting the CCP § 1021.5 lodestar. Mandatory fees flow from CCP § 1021.5 enforcing the public right of licensed PA practice protecting California policyholders from claim abandonment and fee fraud. THE ONLY PAGE WITH A NAPIA CODE ADVISORY AND THE ONLY PAGE WITH A PLRB BEST PRACTICES ADVISORY.

What is the difference between a public adjuster (Ins. Code § 14040) and an insurance agent (Ins. Code § 1631)?

A public adjuster under § 14040 represents policyholders in negotiating and settling insurance claims for compensation. An insurance agent under § 1631 represents the insurance company in selling policies. A CDI agent/broker license does not authorize policyholder claims representation for a fee. An unlicensed person crossing into public adjuster territory — negotiating claims on behalf of policyholders and collecting contingency fees from proceeds — without a CDI PA license violates Ins. Code § 14040 independent of any agent/broker license they may hold.

Does California cap public adjuster fees for disaster victims?

Yes. Ins. Code § 15027 caps public adjuster fees at 10% of the total claim settlement for claims arising from a declared state of emergency or state of disaster affecting residential properties, and at 15% for other claims. Fees collected before the public adjuster contract is signed, or fees exceeding the statutory caps, are prohibited regardless of whether the adjuster holds a valid CDI PA license. An unlicensed adjuster collecting upfront fees before signing a contract violates both the § 14040 license requirement and the § 15027 fee cap prohibition.

How is a California CDI public adjuster license verified for § 14040 fee petition purposes?

The primary Welch anchor is the CDI License Search at insurance.ca.gov, confirming whether the respondent holds a Public Adjuster license and its current status (active, expired, suspended, revoked). Secondary anchors include: NAPIA member directory at napia.com; CAPIA member directory; and the CDI enforcement action database for prior disciplinary history. A CDI printout confirming no PA license in any category, or an expired/suspended/revoked status, establishes the unlicensed practice element for § 14040 purposes.

How does Missouri v. Jenkins fees-on-fees apply in a § 14040 public adjuster fee petition?

Missouri v. Jenkins, 491 U.S. 274 (1989), makes fee petition prep time compensable; California courts apply this via Ketchum v. Moses, 24 Cal.4th 1122 (2001), and PLCM Group Inc. v. Drexler, 22 Cal.4th 1084 (2000). Recoverable fees include: CDI PA license verification; NAPIA Code violation documentation; PLRB Best Practices deviation analysis; licensed PA or coverage expert coordination; and lodestar declaration with Ketchum multiplier argument. All time recoverable under Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 (1983).