Vertical guide · Updated June 2026

Mass arbitration attorney time tracking: individual filing management, bellwether coordination, and AAA/JAMS fee administration

Q: How are mass arbitration attorneys compensated?

Mass arbitration attorneys typically work on contingency: a percentage of individual recoveries (often 33–40%) plus, in some campaigns, a separately negotiated per-claimant administrative fee or a global settlement fee structure. Some campaigns involving statutory fee-shifting claims (FCRA, FDCPA, TCPA, FLSA) also seek attorneys' fees from the respondent under applicable fee-shifting statutes. The compensation structure means the attorney's hourly value is unlocked at settlement or award, not on a billing cycle — making contemporaneous time records essential for two purposes: (1) any fee-shifting claim requires a lodestar submission under Hensley documenting the actual hours invested; and (2) at global settlement, the per-claimant allocation of the attorney's fee requires demonstrating the actual hours invested per claimant to establish reasonable compensation. Mass arbitration attorneys who do not keep contemporaneous records across hundreds of active claimant files have no reliable basis for the lodestar component of their fee application.

Q: What is the bellwether selection process in mass arbitration?

A bellwether process in mass arbitration is a procedural mechanism — negotiated between claimant counsel and respondent counsel, or ordered by an arbitral administrator — in which a subset of individual arbitrations (typically 10–50 cases) is selected to proceed first to full discovery and hearing while the remaining cases are stayed. The bellwether cases are intended to provide pricing information for global settlement of the non-selected cases: if the bellwether awards average $X per claimant, the parties use that data point to negotiate a global settlement value. For the plaintiff's attorney, bellwether selection generates a concentrated administrative cycle: identifying the subset of claimants whose facts are most representative of the campaign as a whole, reviewing individual claimant files to assess strength, coordinating with respondent counsel on selection methodology, and preparing the selected bellwether claimants for discovery and hearing. This selection and coordination cycle — which may consume 30–80 hours across 2–6 weeks — arrives outside the normal per-claimant billing rhythm and is among the most consistently undertracked phases of mass arbitration practice.

Q: How does AAA mass arbitration fee administration create billing complexity?

The American Arbitration Association's Mass Arbitration Supplementary Rules (effective 2021, revised 2023) provide a staged administrative process for campaigns of 25 or more similar claims filed against a single respondent: initial case assessment, process arbitrator appointment, bellwether selection, and global mediation or individual arbitration. Each administrative stage generates attorney interaction with the AAA case management system, the process arbitrator, and respondent counsel on scheduling and procedural orders — interactions that occur by email and conference call outside the normal litigation calendar. The AAA's billing practices for mass arbitration (filing fees, process arbitrator compensation, mediator fees, case management fees) can total tens of thousands of dollars per campaign and generate a distinct administrative correspondence burden: fee dispute responses, refund requests for cases settled before hearing, and arbitrator objection filings. JAMS has published its own Mass Arbitration Procedures (effective 2022) with a similar staged structure. For an attorney managing an active mass arbitration campaign of 200+ claimants, the administrative correspondence with AAA, JAMS, and the process arbitrator alone generates 3–8 hours/week of call and email activity that reconstruction consistently undervalues.

Mass arbitration practice — coordinated individual arbitration campaigns against a single corporate respondent under AAA Mass Arbitration Supplementary Rules or JAMS Mass Arbitration Procedures — generates three billing-gap sources invisible to end-of-day reconstruction: the per-claimant intake and filing management cycle (each claimant file has its own demand preparation, arbitrator selection, and correspondence track), the bellwether selection and coordinated discovery phase (30–80 concentrated hours of file review and coordination that arrive outside the per-claimant billing rhythm), and settlement authority documentation across hundreds of individual arbitrations (per-claimant calls that each average 20–40 minutes and collectively represent 40–80 hours of call time at 35–50% capture). For a solo attorney managing a campaign of 150 active mass arbitration claimants at $400/hr on a fee-shifting claim, the annual billing gap from these three mechanisms is $55,000–$105,000.

TL;DR

ClaimHour captures every per-claimant intake call, every AAA/JAMS correspondence session, and every bellwether preparation document edit — passively, no timer, no audio, no call contents. It builds the contemporaneous lodestar record that fee-shifting claims and global settlement fee negotiations require. $29–$59/mo. No PMS required.

Per-claimant intake and filing management: individual demand preparation at scale

Mass arbitration campaigns generate individual claimant files — each with its own intake interview, demand preparation, arbitrator selection, and ongoing correspondence track. A campaign of 150 claimants involves 150 separate intake calls (averaging 20–40 minutes each for initial fact gathering, engagement letter execution, and claimant authorization), 150 individual arbitration demands (typically templatized but requiring per-claimant customization of factual allegations, damages calculations, and demand amount), and 150 arbitrator selection processes (responding to the AAA or JAMS arbitrator list for each individual case, exchanging rankings with respondent counsel, challenging arbitrators for cause). Even at high efficiency with template leverage, per-claimant intake and filing generates 4–8 hours per claimant file across the campaign — a total investment of 600–1,200 hours for a 150-claimant campaign that is tracked at the case level rather than the claimant level in reconstruction.

The per-claimant correspondence cycle is the most systematically undertracked component. After demands are filed, each individual claimant file generates recurring contact: AAA or JAMS acknowledgment and initial scheduling communications (15–30 minutes per case), respondent's answer and counterclaims response (30–60 minutes per case where the respondent files individual answers), arbitrator introduction calls or case management conferences (30–45 minutes per case if the process arbitrator schedules them individually), and client status update calls (15–30 minutes per claimant, recurring monthly). For 150 active cases with one status update call per claimant per month: 150 × 20 minutes = 50 hours/month of client contact at 35–50% reconstruction capture = 25–32 untracked hours/month = $10,000–$12,800/month in unbilled phone contact at $400/hr. This is the single largest billing-gap mechanism in mass arbitration practice and has no analog in single-matter contingency practice.

The AAA filing fee administration cycle adds a distinct billing category. Under AAA's Mass Arbitration Supplementary Rules, the respondent owes filing fees for each individual demand filed; respondents routinely contest fee calculations, request extensions, and seek fee adjustments through the AAA's administrative process. Tracking individual filing fee payments and status across 150 cases — following up on delinquent fees, responding to AAA administrative inquiries, and documenting fee disputes for potential sanctions — generates 3–6 hours/month of administrative correspondence that no billing entry captures because it is clerical in character but requires attorney judgment on strategy.

Bellwether selection and coordinated discovery: concentrated investment outside the per-claimant billing rhythm

The bellwether process — selecting a subset of 10–50 individual arbitrations to proceed first while the remaining cases are stayed — generates a concentrated billing period that does not fit the per-claimant work model. Before bellwether cases are selected, the plaintiff's attorney must: review all 150 individual claimant files to assess which present the strongest facts (2–5 minutes per file review × 150 files = 5–12 hours of file review), rank claimants by damages exposure and evidentiary strength (1–3 hours of comparative analysis and ranking spreadsheet work), negotiate the selection methodology with respondent counsel (2–5 hours of calls and email correspondence on selection criteria, number of bellwethers, and administrative timeline), and prepare a submission to the process arbitrator explaining the proposed selection and any disagreements with respondent's position (3–8 hours of drafting). Total bellwether selection cycle: 13–28 hours concentrated in a 2–4 week window, billed to the campaign but not attributable to any individual claimant file.

Once bellwether cases are selected, the coordinated discovery phase generates billing complexity at two levels simultaneously: individual-case discovery for each bellwether claimant (full document requests, depositions, expert designation) and campaign-level coordination between the bellwether track and the stayed cases (deciding which shared legal theories to test in bellwethers, which experts to retain jointly across multiple bellwether cases, and how to structure settlement authority calls with bellwether claimants). For 20 bellwether cases each requiring 30–50 hours of individual discovery plus 15–25 hours of campaign-level coordination: 615–1,000 hours of discovery work in a compressed timeline. The campaign-level coordination work — joint expert calls, respondent's counsel calls on bellwether scheduling, process arbitrator status conferences — is the component most likely to be omitted from the billing record because it does not attach naturally to any single claimant file. At $400/hr, 20–40 hours/month of coordination work at 45% reconstruction capture = $3,600–$7,200/month of untracked coordination billing.

The global mediation or settlement negotiation cycle arrives after the bellwether awards provide pricing data. A full-campaign global settlement negotiation — multiple mediator sessions, counter-proposal exchanges with respondent, and per-claimant settlement authority calls — generates 40–80 hours concentrated in a 4–8 week period. The per-claimant settlement authority calls (each claimant must individually authorize a settlement) alone consume 150 × 20 minutes = 50 hours of client contact that reconstruction records as "settlement calls" without per-claimant granularity. If the campaign includes FCRA, FDCPA, or TCPA fee-shifting claims and the attorney submits a lodestar fee declaration at global settlement, that declaration must reconstruct 600–1,200 hours of campaign work from billing records that may capture 40–55% of actual time — resulting in a fee declaration understating the actual attorney investment by 45–60%.

Fee-shifting claims and lodestar documentation at global settlement

Many mass arbitration campaigns are built on statutory fee-shifting claims: FCRA (15 U.S.C. § 1681n(a)(3)), FDCPA (15 U.S.C. § 1692k(a)(3)), TCPA (47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(3)), FLSA (29 U.S.C. § 216(b)), or state UDAP statutes. Under each, a prevailing plaintiff is entitled to attorney fees calculated under the lodestar method: hours reasonably expended × reasonable hourly rate (Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 (1983)). In a global settlement of a mass arbitration campaign, the parties may negotiate a combined consideration package that includes a claimant settlement fund plus a separately negotiated attorneys' fee component. The attorneys' fee component is typically documented by a lodestar declaration — an affidavit or declaration from the plaintiff's attorney setting out the hours invested and the billing rate claimed.

The lodestar declaration in a mass arbitration global settlement is the most valuable and most vulnerable document in the attorney's billing record. Valuable because respondents pay separately for it; vulnerable because the underlying billing records may have been maintained at the campaign level rather than the per-claimant level, reconstruction may cover only 40–55% of actual time, and per-claimant client contact calls — the single largest time category — may appear as undifferentiated "client communications" blocks without individual-matter attribution. A lodestar declaration that claims 800 hours but can only document 450 contemporaneous hours is discounted proportionally in settlement negotiations: the respondent's counsel uses the documentation gap as negotiating leverage to reduce the fee component, and the mediator or arbitrator uses it as a basis for awarding below the declared rate. For a campaign with 800 actual hours at $400/hr ($320,000 lodestar) but a documented record covering only 450 hours ($180,000 documented lodestar): a 30% documentation gap = $42,000 of the lodestar component the attorney cannot recover.

The fees-on-fees component of mass arbitration — time spent negotiating the attorneys' fee component in the global settlement — is itself compensable in many fee-shifting contexts (Missouri v. Jenkins, 491 U.S. 274 (1989)) and represents 20–40 hours of final settlement negotiation work per campaign. For 3 campaigns concluded per year, each with 30 hours of fees-on-fees at $400/hr: $36,000 of recoverable fees-on-fees — recoverable only if the underlying campaign billing record is contemporaneous and the lodestar declaration passes scrutiny. Total annual billing gap for a 150-claimant mass arbitration practice: $55,000–$105,000.

How ClaimHour fits mass arbitration practice

If you manage mass arbitration campaigns on contingency with fee-shifting claims — and your lodestar declarations have been challenged in settlement negotiations because your per-claimant call logs and campaign coordination hours are not documented contemporaneously — ClaimHour was built for that gap. The passive capture logs every per-claimant status call, every AAA/JAMS administrative correspondence session, and every bellwether preparation document session (iOS call metadata: duration, timestamp, direction; email activity: sent/received counts and subject-line timestamps; Word/Pages document edit time) and surfaces them in a two-minute evening digest for matter or campaign attribution. No audio. No call contents. Privilege is preserved. Join the waitlist and we'll email when early access opens.

Get early access