ClaimHour

Vertical guide · Updated June 2026

Insurance bad faith attorney time tracking: UM/UIM coverage disputes, reservation of rights responses, and Brandt fee documentation

Plaintiff-side insurance bad faith practice has a billing feature unique in all of solo practice: in states that follow Brandt v. Superior Court and its statutory equivalents, attorney fees incurred to compel payment of a wrongfully denied claim are recoverable as consequential damages in the bad faith action itself. The contemporaneous billing record is not simply a subsequent fee petition exhibit — it is evidence of case value from the day the representation begins. A bad faith solo whose billing records understate actual hours is simultaneously understating the case's damages, undervaluing the settlement demand, and underpreparing for trial. The insurance defense tests the billing record's credibility at every opportunity, because every disputed hour is a dollar off the damages demand.

TL;DR

ClaimHour captures coverage analysis sessions, reservation of rights letter responses, UM/UIM medical record review, coverage negotiation calls, and Brandt fee accumulation — passively, no timer, no audio, no document contents. It builds the contemporaneous billing record that is evidence of damages in bad faith cases from day one, not just a fee petition at the end. $29–$59/mo. No PMS required.

The Brandt fee problem: billing records as damages evidence

In a first-party bad faith case, the attorney's billing record serves two functions simultaneously. First, it is the ordinary hourly billing record used to invoice the client for work performed. Second, in states that allow Brandt fee recovery, it is the record of consequential damages caused by the insurer's bad faith: every hour the attorney spends compelling the insurer to pay what it was contractually obligated to pay is an hour of damages the insurer caused. The settlement demand in a bad faith case includes the Brandt fees as a damages line item, and that line item is only as accurate as the billing record that supports it.

A UM/UIM case in which the insurer wrongfully denies $150,000 in policy limits generates 40–80 hours of attorney work to compel payment: coverage analysis, reservation of rights responses, medical record review, expert coordination, negotiation calls, and mediation preparation. At $400/hr, that is $16,000–$32,000 in Brandt fee damages. If the billing record captures only 65% of actual hours due to reconstruction, the settlement demand reflects $10,400–$20,800 in Brandt fees instead of $16,000–$32,000 — a $5,600–$11,200 reduction in settlement demand per case from billing undercount alone. For a 20-case UM/UIM practice: $112,000–$224,000 in annual settlement demand reduction from systematic billing undercount.

The insurer's defense also uses the billing record to test credibility. A round-number, reconstructed billing record invites the defense to argue that the claimed fees are estimates rather than actual time, are padded, or are disproportionate to the work performed. A contemporaneous record with specific entries — "reviewed insurer's reservation of rights letter, analyzed exclusion provisions § II.3(a) through § II.3(e), 1.8 hours" — is defensible as actual work. The difference between a defended record and a contested record in a bad faith trial is not just credibility; it is the amount the jury awards for the Brandt component of damages.

Reservation of rights response: the coverage analysis cycle

A policyholder under a reservation of rights letter receives notification that the insurer is defending under a reservation of the right to deny coverage while continuing to provide a defense. Responding to a reservation of rights letter requires: reviewing the policy declaration page and all relevant coverage provisions and exclusions (1–3 hours, depending on policy complexity), researching the specific coverage dispute issue — typically whether the exclusion cited in the reservation letter actually applies to the claim facts (2–4 hours of case research), preparing the policyholder's coverage position response letter (1–2 hours), and coordinating with the retained defense counsel about their continued obligations while the coverage dispute is pending (30–60 minutes of calls).

The per-matter cycle generates 4–10 hours of coverage work across 1–2 weeks. In reconstructed billing at month end, this cycle appears as a single "coverage review and correspondence" round-number entry. For a practice handling 20 reservation-of-rights matters per year, each cycle's 4–10 hours at 60% reconstruction capture leaves 1.6–4 hours untracked per matter: 32–80 hours/year = $12,800–$32,000 at $400/hr in annual billing loss from coverage analysis work alone.

UM/UIM medical record review: the multi-provider reading problem

Underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) claims require the attorney to review the policyholder's complete medical record from initial injury through maximum medical improvement. A soft-tissue injury with 18 months of treatment generates records from the emergency room, the primary care physician, the orthopedic or neurology specialist, the physical therapist (weekly notes across 12–18 months), the IME physician retained by the insurer, and the life care planning report. Total record volume: 500–2,000 pages from 5–8 providers.

A birth injury or serious orthopedic UM/UIM case generates records from 10–15 providers across 3–5 years of treatment: 3,000–8,000 pages. Systematic review takes 20–80 hours depending on case complexity and record volume. In reconstructed billing at month end, this appears as 2–4 "medical record review" entries at round numbers that capture 40–55% of actual reading time. The specific daily review sessions — "ER records and discharge summary, January 15, 2.5 hours" versus "orthopedic specialist progress notes, January 17–18, 3.5 hours" — are not distinguished in reconstruction.

Dollar arithmetic for a 20-case UM/UIM practice at $400/hr: medical record review gap of 8–20 hours per case (depending on complexity mix) = 160–400 hours/year at 50% capture = 80–200 hours/year untracked = $32,000–$80,000. This figure is not just a billing loss — it is a Brandt fee damages deficit. The settlement demand for each case is undervalued by $3,200–$8,000 in medical review Brandt fees that the record does not support.

Coverage negotiation calls: the compounding call volume

Insurance coverage disputes generate an intensive negotiation call sequence across the life of the case. A UM/UIM coverage dispute with a policy limits demand typically proceeds through: the initial demand call establishing the coverage position (20–40 minutes), the insurer's counter-offer call (15–30 minutes), one or more coverage clarification calls in which the insurer's adjuster asks additional questions about the treatment records (15–25 minutes each), the Brandt reservation call — a call in which the attorney formally notifies the insurer that attorney fees are accumulating as consequential damages (15–20 minutes), the mediation coordination calls (2–4 calls of 15–30 minutes each), and the final policy limits demand call or settlement call (30–60 minutes). Total: 8–15 significant calls per case across 6–18 months of negotiation.

At 20–35 minutes average per call: 3–9 hours of call time per case in the negotiation sequence. For 20 active cases: 60–180 hours of negotiation call time per year. In reconstructed billing at month end, this appears as 2–3 "adjuster communications" entries per month that capture 35–45% of actual call time. ClaimHour captures each call at its actual duration with the counterparty identified, so the billing record for each case shows the complete negotiation call sequence — evidence that the settlement demand for Brandt fees is grounded in documented work, not estimated time.

How ClaimHour fits insurance bad faith practice

If you represent policyholders in first-party bad faith claims, UM/UIM coverage disputes, or property insurance bad faith matters — and you've ever realized that your Brandt fee demand was lower than the actual time invested because the coverage analysis sessions, the medical record review, and the negotiation call volume weren't documented at actual duration — ClaimHour was built for that gap. Join the waitlist and we'll email when early access opens.

Get early access

Related questions

What are Brandt fees, and why do they make billing records evidence of damages?

Brandt v. Superior Court, 37 Cal.3d 813 (1985) held that attorney fees incurred to compel payment of a wrongfully denied insurance claim are recoverable as consequential damages in a bad faith action — not merely as a subsequent fee petition but as part of the compensatory damages proven at trial. Every hour of work spent compelling payment is an hour of damages the insurer caused. A billing record that understates actual hours understates the case's damages, undervalues the settlement demand, and shortchanges the jury verdict. States with equivalent statutes include Washington (RCW § 48.30.015), Montana (§ 33-18-242), and Nevada (NRS § 686A.310).

How does ClaimHour track coverage analysis work across multiple policy provisions?

Document focus-duration captures each session in which a policy document, coverage memo, or reservation of rights letter is in active focus. A 2-hour session reviewing the UM endorsement and exclusions schedule appears in the evening digest as a 2-hour event for attribution to the bad faith matter. A separate 90-minute session reviewing the insurer's coverage position letter and drafting the policyholder's response appears as a separate event. The record builds provision by provision across the coverage dispute, producing the contemporaneous documentation that Brandt damages require and that defense coverage experts will test.

How does ClaimHour handle the medical record review intensive in UM/UIM cases?

Each medical record reading session is captured with file name and duration. A 3-hour session reviewing 18 months of physical therapy notes and a 2-hour session reviewing the IME report appear as distinct events attributable to the UM/UIM matter. For a 20-matter practice, this captures 80–200 hours of medical review per year at actual duration rather than 40–50% reconstruction capture — the difference of $32,000–$80,000 in documented Brandt fee damages that the settlement demand and trial record can support.

Does the Brandt fee doctrine apply outside California?

Several states have statutory equivalents: Washington's Insurance Fair Conduct Act (RCW § 48.30.015), Montana's Unfair Trade Practices Act (§ 33-18-242), and Nevada's § 686A.310 all allow attorney fee recovery against insurers who wrongfully deny claims. Beyond specific bad faith statutes, most states allow fee recovery under common law bad faith damages theories or state UDAP statutes. In all of these states, the contemporaneous billing record is the evidence of fee damages from day one of representation.

Further reading