California CSLB Pipeline Contractor C-34 Attorney Fee Petition Mechanics: Tyler Odyssey Civil Complaint Date as Primary Welch Anchor, CSLB License Check (C-34 Specialty) as Secondary Anchor (THE ONLY C-34 Pipeline Contractor Specialty Page in This Series — ONLY Page With CPUC Pipeline Safety Dual-Regulatory Advisory [Pub. Util. Code § 451; CPUC General Order 112-F; Gas Company Installation Authorization Record — Two Searchable Institutional Databases]; ONLY Page With Federal Pipeline Safety Act Pure Ketchum Analysis [49 U.S.C. §§ 60101 et seq.; PHMSA; 49 CFR Parts 192 & 195 — THE ONLY PAGE in the CSLB Sub-Series Applying Pipeline Safety Act Federal Preemption Analysis; DISTINCT From C-57 Well Drilling]; ONLY Page With Gas Leak/Explosion [CPUC/PHMSA Pipeline Failure] / Water Contamination [Failed Water Main Tap] / Underground Infrastructure Strike [Pub. Util. Code § 4216 DigAlert 811] Three-Track Harm; Bus. & Prof. Code § 7031(b) Disgorgement), CLRA § 1780 Mandatory Attorney Fees

Statutory Framework: Bus. & Prof. Code § 7028, C-34 Pipeline Specialty, CPUC General Order 112-F, Federal Pipeline Safety Act (49 U.S.C. §§ 60101 et seq.; PHMSA; 49 CFR Parts 192 & 195), Pub. Util. Code § 4216 DigAlert 811, § 7031(b) Disgorgement, and CLRA § 1780 Mandatory Attorney Fees

California Business and Professions Code § 7028 prohibits unlicensed contracting. The CSLB C-34 Pipeline Contractor classification authorizes the excavation, installation, joining, pressure-testing, and backfill of underground pipelines: natural gas service lines (from the gas distribution main in the street to the gas meter at the structure), water service lines (from the water distribution main to the structure's water meter or point of entry), and other underground pipeline infrastructure. Any person who performs C-34 pipeline work as a standalone trade for a contract price exceeding $500 in California without a valid C-34 license violates § 7028. C-34 is distinct from C-36 Plumbing (which covers interior gas piping within the structure from the meter to appliances, and interior water supply piping, but not the exterior service line from the distribution main — C-34 covers the underground service line connection between the distribution main and the structure), C-57 Well Drilling (which covers water well boring and casing under SWRCB/DWR regulatory jurisdiction rather than CPUC/PHMSA pipeline safety), and C-42 Sanitation System (which covers sewer and septic systems rather than gas or water service lines).

Public Utilities Code § 451 requires every public utility in California to furnish and maintain adequate, efficient, just, and reasonable service, instrumentalities, equipment, and facilities, and to make all repairs necessary for such service. Under this authority, the CPUC promulgated General Order 112-F (Safety Rules and Regulations Governing the Design, Construction, Testing, Maintenance, and Operation of Utility Natural Gas Facilities), which establishes design, construction, testing, and operation standards for gas distribution and transmission facilities. Gas distribution utilities operating under CPUC jurisdiction — Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SoCal Gas), Southwest Gas Corporation — require that contractors performing service line installation and tap work in their distribution territory be authorized by the gas company before commencing any work affecting the gas distribution system. The gas company's authorization requirement is a separate regulatory compliance obligation independent of CSLB C-34 licensure.

The Pipeline Safety Act (49 U.S.C. §§ 60101 et seq.) is the federal statute governing pipeline safety. PHMSA enforces federal pipeline safety regulations: 49 CFR Part 192 (natural gas pipeline safety) and 49 CFR Part 195 (hazardous liquid pipeline safety). 49 CFR Part 192 specifies minimum standards for the design, installation, inspection, testing, construction, extension, operation, replacement, and management of pipeline facilities used in the transportation of gas. Pipeline Safety Act § 60118(d) provides that “this chapter does not preempt the authority of a State authority having jurisdiction over pipeline safety to impose additional safety requirements on intrastate gas or hazardous liquid pipeline facilities beyond those required under this chapter.” This provision — confirming that the Pipeline Safety Act does not preempt state-law civil claims — is unique to C-34 pipeline matters and is analyzed on no other CSLB specialty page in the fee-petition-mechanics series.

Public Utilities Code § 4216 establishes the California Underground Facilities Safe Excavation Act and creates the DigAlert 811 underground facility marking system. Before performing any excavation in California, the excavating contractor must call DigAlert 811 (Underground Service Alert) at least two full working days before commencing excavation and allow all underground facility operators to mark the horizontal route and approximate depth of their facilities. An unlicensed C-34 contractor who excavates for pipeline installation without calling DigAlert 811 violates Pub. Util. Code § 4216 and risks striking existing gas, electric, telecommunications, water, or sewer lines — creating the third independent harm track unique to C-34 pipeline excavation matters.

Three Unique Distinctions in the Fee-Petition-Mechanics Series

• THE ONLY page with CPUC PIPELINE SAFETY DUAL-REGULATORY ADVISORY — California Public Utilities Commission oversight of gas distribution/transmission pipeline safety [Pub. Util. Code § 451; CPUC General Order 112-F] applies when unlicensed C-34 installs natural gas service line from distribution main; gas distribution utility requires licensed contractor authorization and post-installation inspection before gas is restored; unlicensed C-34 who installs gas service line without gas company authorization creates DUAL REGULATORY VIOLATION (CSLB C-34 license absence + gas company installation authorization absence) — two searchable institutional databases; PURE KETCHUM — CPUC Pub. Util. Code § 451 creates no private right of action for homeowners against unlicensed C-34 contractors; CPUC administrative enforcement only: the CPUC dual-regulatory advisory generates pre-complaint hours unique to C-34 natural gas service line installation matters: (a) the attorney must identify the gas distribution utility serving the property — PG&E (northern California), Southern California Gas Company (southern California), Southwest Gas Corporation (portions of southern California near Nevada/Arizona border) — because each gas company maintains its own contractor authorization program and records; (b) confirming the C-34 contractor's CSLB license status through the CSLB License Check at cslb.ca.gov — C-34 specialty presence or absence; (c) confirming the contractor's gas company authorization status — the gas utility's contractor authorization list or authorization records can be confirmed through a pre-litigation inquiry to the gas company; if the contractor was not on the gas utility's authorized contractor list at the time of the service line installation, the gas company did not approve the work and will typically require a licensed contractor to re-inspect or re-install the service connection before restoring gas service; (d) advising on CPUC General Order 112-F requirements applicable to service line installation: Section 113 (design requirements for service lines — pipe material, minimum wall thickness, pressure rating for the operating pressure of the distribution system, cathodic protection requirements for metallic pipe); Section 192 (installation and testing requirements — service line installation depth, protection from traffic and frost damage, pressure testing before gas is restored); an unlicensed C-34 who installed service line materials that do not comply with GO 112-F material specifications (e.g., improper polyethylene pipe for operating pressure exceeding the pipe's pressure rating, metallic pipe without cathodic protection) created a compliance defect that may require complete service line replacement; (e) the CPUC dual-regulatory advisory is THE ONLY PAGE in the fee-petition-mechanics series applying the CPUC pipeline safety regulatory framework (Pub. Util. Code § 451 + CPUC GO 112-F) to an unlicensed contractor licensing matter — DISTINCT from C-38 Refrigeration (which covers EPA Section 608 refrigerant technician certification, not gas pipeline safety) and DISTINCT from C-36 Plumbing (which covers DPH cross-connection control and interior water supply, not exterior gas service line installation under CPUC jurisdiction); the C-34 CPUC advisory creates the only dual CSLB/gas utility institutional database search in the entire fee-petition-mechanics series.
• THE ONLY page with FEDERAL PIPELINE SAFETY ACT PURE KETCHUM ANALYSIS [49 U.S.C. §§ 60101 et seq.; PHMSA Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration; 49 CFR Parts 192 (natural gas) and 195 (hazardous liquids)] — THE ONLY PAGE IN THE CSLB SPECIALTY SUB-SERIES applying Pipeline Safety Act federal preemption analysis; Pipeline Safety Act creates no private right of action for homeowners against unlicensed C-34 contractors; PHMSA enforcement is administrative/criminal only; Pipeline Safety Act § 60118(d) expressly preserves state civil claims; California Gas Pipe Installation Code [Title 24 Part 4; adopted from NFPA 54] is administrative — PURE KETCHUM; DISTINCT from C-57 Well Drilling [which covers water well boring and faces SWRCB/DWR regulatory framework, not CPUC/PHMSA]: the Pipeline Safety Act pure Ketchum analysis generates pre-complaint advisory hours unique to C-34 pipeline matters: (a) the attorney must analyze whether any federal statute creates mandatory fee-shifting against the unlicensed C-34 contractor — the Pipeline Safety Act (49 U.S.C. §§ 60101 et seq.) is the natural statutory candidate because it governs pipeline safety, but it creates no private right of action for homeowners; PHMSA enforcement is administrative (civil penalty authority up to $200,000 per violation per day under 49 U.S.C. § 60122) and criminal (49 U.S.C. § 60123) but not a private cause of action; (b) advising on 49 CFR Part 192 as a PURE KETCHUM standard of care — 49 CFR § 192.281 specifies installation standards for plastic pipe (minimum cover of 24 inches for service lines, 30 inches under roadways); 49 CFR § 192.283 specifies qualification requirements for plastic pipe joining procedures; 49 CFR § 192.285 specifies qualification requirements for persons making plastic pipe joints — an unlicensed C-34 whose workers are not qualified under 49 CFR § 192.285 installed pipeline joints that do not meet federal standards; 49 CFR Part 192 standards are PURE KETCHUM (federal administrative regulations, not private standards, but creating no private right of action against the contractor); (c) analyzing Pipeline Safety Act § 60118(d) preservation of state claims — confirming that the CLRA § 1780 claim against the unlicensed C-34 contractor is not preempted by federal pipeline safety law; this preemption analysis is unique to C-34 pipeline matters and is performed on no other specialty page in the series; (d) advising on NFPA 54 (National Fuel Gas Code) and its California adoption as Title 24 Part 4 (California Gas Pipe Installation Code) — NFPA 54 is a private National Fire Protection Association standard (PURE KETCHUM — private standard, no mandatory civil fees); Title 24 Part 4 is California's administrative adoption of NFPA 54, also PURE KETCHUM administrative; NFPA 54/Title 24 Part 4 specifies interior gas piping installation requirements including pipe sizing, approved materials, joint types, testing requirements, and appliance connection standards — an unlicensed C-34 who also installed interior gas piping within the structure (beyond the service line itself) must comply with NFPA 54/Title 24 Part 4; (e) the Pipeline Safety Act pure Ketchum analysis is THE ONLY PAGE in the fee-petition-mechanics series performing federal pipeline safety preemption analysis for a CSLB specialty contractor — DISTINCT from C-57 Well Drilling (which faces SWRCB Water Code §§ 13800–13806 and DWR Water Well Standards, not federal pipeline safety law) and from C-60 Welding (which addresses API 1104 pipeline welding qualification standards for the welding trade, not the C-34 pipeline installation license or CPUC/PHMSA regulatory framework).
• THE ONLY page with GAS LEAK/EXPLOSION (CPUC/PHMSA pipeline failure) / WATER CONTAMINATION (failed water main tap) / UNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTURE STRIKE three-track harm — all three harms arise from C-34 pipeline installation errors; Pub. Util. Code § 4216 (DigAlert 811) underground utility strike advisory applies when unlicensed C-34 excavates for pipeline without calling DigAlert 811; DISTINCT from C-12 Earthwork and Paving three-track harm [which covers stormwater/SWRCB CGP/DTSC contaminated soil; C-34 covers pipeline-specific gas explosion, water contamination, and underground utility strike harms]: the three harm tracks generate distinct CLRA actual damages and advisory hours unique to C-34 pipeline matters: Track 1 — GAS LEAK/EXPLOSION: an improperly installed natural gas service line — using under-rated pipe materials, non-compliant plastic pipe fusion joints or mechanical fittings, insufficient burial depth, or service line routing too close to foundation penetrations — leaks gas into the soil adjacent to the structure or into the structure itself through foundation cracks or utility conduit penetrations; natural gas (primarily methane) is odorized (with mercaptan) by the gas utility but can accumulate in enclosed subfloor spaces, crawl spaces, and basements before being detected; accumulated gas that reaches its lower flammable limit (LFL — approximately 5% gas concentration in air for methane) in an enclosed space can ignite from any electrical spark, thermostat switching, or open flame, causing a structural fire or explosion; Track 1 CLRA actual damages include: emergency pipeline excavation and repair by the gas utility's authorized contractor; structural fire damage repair (if ignition occurred); gas-saturated soil excavation and aeration; and temporary housing costs during structure repair; natural gas service line failure resulting in structure fire can generate total loss events with CLRA actual damages exceeding $500,000 in residential markets; Track 2 — WATER CONTAMINATION: an improperly tapped water service connection from the distribution main — using a non-pressure-rated saddle fitting, an improper tap size relative to the distribution main material, or a service line pipe material incompatible with the water supply chemistry — can create a cross-connection between the potable water supply and the adjacent soil environment; a failed compression fitting or improper polyethylene pipe joint in the service line allows soil intrusion into the water supply under negative pressure conditions (distribution system pressure drop during peak demand or main flushing); Track 2 CLRA actual damages include: water service excavation and repair; water quality testing (coliform bacteria, turbidity, pH, heavy metals — especially if the excavation was through contaminated urban fill); and affected interior plumbing replacement if contaminated water entered the structure's distribution system; Track 3 — UNDERGROUND UTILITY STRIKE: an unlicensed C-34 who excavates for pipeline installation without calling DigAlert 811 in violation of Pub. Util. Code § 4216 risks striking any of the underground utilities present in the right-of-way or along the pipeline route — electric power lines (CATV 480V or 12kV distribution), natural gas distribution mains (striking the adjacent main during service line trenching), telecommunications conduits (copper and fiber), or potable water mains; an electric line strike creates an immediate electrocution and explosion hazard for the excavation crew and adjacent structure occupants; a gas main strike by mechanical excavation causes immediate gas release requiring evacuation and emergency response; Track 3 CLRA actual damages include: third-party utility repair costs (the struck utility operator is entitled to recover repair costs from the excavating contractor under Pub. Util. Code § 4216.3); service outage damages; and any consequential property damage from the utility strike (gas main strike causing fire, electric line strike causing structure fire).

PURE KETCHUM for Bus. & Prof. Code § 7028 C-34 Pipeline Contractor licensing violations: the Pipeline Safety Act (49 U.S.C. §§ 60101 et seq.) creates no private right of action for homeowners against unlicensed C-34 pipeline contractors — PHMSA enforcement is administrative and criminal under 49 U.S.C. §§ 60122–60123; Pipeline Safety Act § 60118(d) expressly preserves California state law civil claims confirming the CLRA § 1780 claim is free from federal preemption; the CPUC Pub. Util. Code § 451 is California administrative enforcement only, no mandatory civil attorney fees for homeowners; CPUC General Order 112-F is an administrative regulatory order — PURE KETCHUM; NFPA 54 National Fuel Gas Code and its California adoption as Title 24 Part 4 are administrative standards — PURE KETCHUM; Pub. Util. Code § 4216 (DigAlert 811) creates administrative liability for excavators who fail to call DigAlert but does not independently create mandatory civil attorney fees for homeowners against unlicensed C-34 contractors in CSLB § 7028 proceedings; the CLRA § 1780 mandatory attorney fee entitlement against the unlicensed C-34 contractor is pure Ketchum; Ketchum v. Moses 24 Cal.4th 1122 (2001); PLCM Group Inc. v. Drexler 22 Cal.4th 1084 (2000); Hensley v. Eckerhart 461 U.S. 424 (1983); Missouri v. Jenkins 491 U.S. 274 (1989) fees-on-fees.

Primary Welch Anchor: Tyler Odyssey Civil Complaint Filing Date

The Tyler Odyssey civil complaint filing date is the primary Welch temporal anchor. In C-34 pipeline matters, the attorney files after confirming the C-34 license status, conducting the CPUC dual-regulatory advisory (CSLB License Check + gas company installation authorization record), completing the Pipeline Safety Act pure Ketchum preemption analysis, confirming the DigAlert 811 call record status for any excavation work, engaging a licensed gas pipeline engineer to assess the quality and code compliance of the pipeline installation, quantifying CLRA damages across all three harm tracks (gas leak/explosion, water contamination, underground utility strike), and serving the CLRA § 1782 demand. The CSLB C-34 License Check date is the secondary Welch anchor from which all pre-complaint advisory hours accrue.

Secondary Anchor: CSLB License Check (C-34 Pipeline Specialty) — THE ONLY C-34 Specialty Anchor in the Fee-Petition-Mechanics Series

The CSLB License Check must confirm the C-34 Pipeline specialty — distinct from C-36 (Plumbing, which covers interior gas and water piping within the structure), C-57 (Well Drilling, which covers water well boring), and C-42 (Sanitation System, which covers sewer and septic). A B general building contractor license does not authorize standalone C-34 pipeline installation contracts. Three status scenarios generate § 7028 liability: (a) no CSLB license of any kind; (b) C-36, C-57, or B-license without C-34 for standalone underground pipeline contracts; (c) expired, suspended, or revoked C-34 license. The C-34 License Check date is the secondary Welch anchor and this page is THE ONLY C-34 Pipeline Contractor specialty anchor in the entire fee-petition-mechanics series.

Billing Gap 1 — CSLB License Check (C-34 Specialty), CPUC Gas Company Installation Authorization Record Advisory, DigAlert 811 Call Records Advisory, Pipeline Installation Method Inspection, and § 1782 Demand (5.25 hrs/yr = $1,575–$2,625)

The first billing gap covers pre-complaint advisory: C-34 licensing confirmation, CPUC dual-regulatory advisory, DigAlert 811 call records advisory, pipeline installation method inspection, and CLRA § 1782 demand.

• Searching the CSLB License Check at cslb.ca.gov for the C-34 Pipeline specialty and establishing the secondary Welch anchor: confirming C-34 specialty presence or absence; advising on C-36, C-57, or B-without-C-34 scenario for standalone underground pipeline contracts; confirming bond and workers' compensation status for collection analysis.
• Conducting the CPUC gas company installation authorization advisory — identifying the gas distribution utility serving the property (PG&E, SoCal Gas, or Southwest Gas), inquiring to the gas utility regarding the contractor's authorization status at the time of the service line installation, and confirming whether the gas company performed a post-installation inspection before restoring gas service: the gas utility authorization inquiry generates a second pre-complaint institutional record; absence of gas company authorization establishes the dual regulatory violation advisory unique to C-34 natural gas service line matters.
• Conducting the DigAlert 811 call records advisory — confirming whether the unlicensed C-34 contractor placed a DigAlert 811 locate request before excavating for the pipeline installation, and whether all underground facilities in the excavation zone were marked before excavation commenced: DigAlert 811 records are maintained by Underground Service Alert (USA) of Southern California and USA North — records are searchable by contractor name, address, and excavation date; absence of a DigAlert 811 call record confirms Pub. Util. Code § 4216 non-compliance.
• Assessing the pipeline installation method — identifying the pipe material (polyethylene, copper, steel), pipe size and pressure rating, joining method (heat fusion for PE, compression fittings, threaded), burial depth, cathodic protection (for metallic pipe), and comparison to CPUC GO 112-F and 49 CFR Part 192 requirements: the pipeline installation method assessment generates pre-complaint hours for material compliance review and installation defect identification.
• Quantifying § 7031(b) disgorgement and CLRA § 1780 actual damages (emergency gas line repair, water service repair, utility strike repair, CPUC GO 112-F compliant reinstallation) and serving the CLRA § 1782 demand: service line installation contracts range from $2,000 to $20,000+; emergency gas leak repair $1,000–$10,000+; complete service line replacement $3,000–$15,000+; utility strike repair costs vary by utility type and severity.

Billing Gap 2 — Active Litigation: Licensed Gas Pipeline Engineer Assessment, Gas Leak Testing Records Review, Underground Utility Strike Investigation, and CPUC GO 112-F Compliance Documentation Review (4.00 hrs/yr = $1,200–$2,000)

The second billing gap covers expert coordination across the gas leak/explosion, water contamination, and underground utility strike harm tracks.

• Retaining a licensed gas pipeline engineer (California Professional Engineer licensed in Mechanical or Civil Engineering with pipeline safety experience) — to assess the quality of the service line installation against 49 CFR Part 192 and CPUC GO 112-F: pipe material specification compliance, joint qualification records under 49 CFR § 192.283–192.285, burial depth compliance, cathodic protection design, and pressure test records; quantifying complete service line replacement cost as Track 1 CLRA actual damages: the gas pipeline engineer generates the Track 1 gas leak/explosion harm documentation and compliant reinstallation cost estimate.
• Reviewing gas leak testing records — confirming whether the unlicensed C-34 contractor performed the required pressure test of the service line installation before gas service was restored; 49 CFR § 192.511 requires leak testing of service lines before they are placed in service; CPUC GO 112-F Section 192 similarly requires pressure testing; absence of pressure test documentation establishes the installation defect: gas leak test record review generates litigation-phase advisory hours for deficiency documentation.
• Investigating the underground utility strike — if a DigAlert 811 call was not made and a utility strike occurred, coordinating with the struck utility operator to obtain strike documentation, repair cost records, and service outage duration records as Track 3 CLRA actual damages: utility strike investigation generates advisory hours for repair cost documentation and Pub. Util. Code § 4216 violation analysis.
• Settlement valuation incorporating § 7031(b) disgorgement, CLRA § 1780 actual damages across all three tracks (gas line repair/replacement, water service repair, utility strike costs), and CLRA § 1780 mandatory attorney fees: the multi-track C-34 settlement demand generates advisory hours specific to the pipeline specialty's unique three-track damages architecture.

Billing Gap 3 — CLRA § 1780 Fee Petition, Pure Ketchum Multiplier, Lodestar Documentation, and Missouri v. Jenkins Fees-on-Fees (4.00 hrs/yr = $1,200–$2,000)

The third billing gap covers fee recovery preparation across all three C-34 harm tracks.

• Documenting the CLRA § 1780 lodestar from the CSLB C-34 License Check date: capturing CPUC dual-regulatory advisory hours (CSLB License Check + gas company authorization inquiry), DigAlert 811 call records advisory hours, Pipeline Safety Act pure Ketchum preemption analysis hours, gas pipeline engineer coordination hours, gas leak testing records review hours, utility strike investigation hours, and three-track damages analysis hours as CLRA § 1780 fee-petition-eligible work.
• Briefing the pure Ketchum multiplier: Ketchum factors: (a) contingency risk; (b) novelty/difficulty — CPUC dual-regulatory advisory (gas utility authorization records, CPUC GO 112-F Section 113/192 material and installation specifications), Pipeline Safety Act pure Ketchum preemption analysis (49 U.S.C. §§ 60101 et seq.; 49 CFR Parts 192/195; § 60118(d) state claim preservation; PHMSA enforcement scope), DigAlert 811 call records advisory (Pub. Util. Code § 4216 non-compliance documentation), and three-track gas explosion/water contamination/utility strike damages integration — the CPUC/PHMSA dual-regulatory novelty is unique to C-34 pipeline matters and found on no other page in the series; (c) results obtained; Ketchum v. Moses 24 Cal.4th 1122 (2001).
• Missouri v. Jenkins fees-on-fees for the fee petition: Missouri v. Jenkins 491 U.S. 274 (1989).

Total Annual Billing Gap — Three-Gap Summary

• Gap 1 (C-34 CSLB search, CPUC gas company authorization advisory, DigAlert 811 call records advisory, pipeline installation inspection, § 1782 demand): 5.25 hrs = $1,575–$2,625/yr
• Gap 2 (licensed gas pipeline engineer assessment, gas leak testing records review, underground utility strike investigation, CPUC GO 112-F compliance documentation review): 4.00 hrs = $1,200–$2,000/yr
• Gap 3 (CLRA § 1780 fee petition, pure Ketchum multiplier, lodestar documentation, fees-on-fees): 4.00 hrs = $1,200–$2,000/yr
• Total: 13.25 hrs = $3,975–$6,625/yr untracked at $300–$500/hr median California solo practitioner rate

Related California Attorney Fee Petition Pages

• California CSLB Plumbing Contractor C-36 — Bus. & Prof. Code § 7028 (DPH Cross-Connection; Interior Gas & Water Piping)
• California CSLB Well Drilling Contractor C-57 — Bus. & Prof. Code § 7028 (SWRCB/DWR Water Well Standards)
• California CSLB Earthwork & Paving Contractor C-12 — Bus. & Prof. Code § 7028 (SWRCB CGP; DTSC Contaminated Soil; DigAlert 811)
• California CSLB Sanitation System Contractor C-42 — Bus. & Prof. Code § 7028 (Sewer & Septic Systems)