California Fee Petition Mechanics Series

CGCC Licensed Cardroom Gambling Establishment
Bus. & Prof. Code § 19841
Attorney Fee Petition Mechanics

How California solo attorneys build and bill CCP § 1021.5 fee petitions in unlicensed cardroom gambling establishment matters — California Gambling Control Commission license verification, AGA Code of Conduct for Responsible Gaming, NCPG Problem Gambling Minimum Standards for Gambling Operators, Ketchum lodestar.

Governing Statute & License Authority

Business & Professions Code § 19841 — California CGCC State Gambling License, Cardroom Gambling Establishment (California Gambling Control Commission)
Administered by the California Gambling Control Commission (CGCC) in coordination with the Bureau of Gambling Control (BGC). Primary license verification: CGCC License Verification at cgcc.ca.gov. Business & Professions Code § 19841 (California Gambling Control Act, Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 19800–19964) prohibits any person from operating a gambling enterprise without first obtaining a valid state gambling license from the CGCC. California cardrooms — also known as card clubs — that offer controlled games (poker, pai gow, and other table card games approved under California regulations) must hold a CGCC state gambling license. Key cardroom license requirements include: (1) CGCC State Gambling License Required: no cardroom may operate, collect rake or fees from players, or conduct any controlled game without a valid CGCC state gambling license — operating without a license violates § 19841 and constitutes a public nuisance and criminal offense under §§ 19950–19960; (2) License per Owner and per Premises: both the gambling enterprise owner and individual key employees (shift managers, gaming supervisors) must hold CGCC-issued licenses or work permits; (3) Approved Game List: only California-approved controlled games may be offered; unlicensed operations by definition have no approved game list compliance; (4) Minimum Internal Controls (MICs): CGCC-licensed cardrooms must adopt and operate under CGCC-approved Minimum Internal Control Standards (MICS) governing accounting, cage operations, surveillance, and patron dispute resolution; (5) Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) Compliance: cardrooms are "financial institutions" under the BSA requiring Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs) for cash transactions over $10,000 and Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs); unlicensed cardrooms have no BSA compliance infrastructure; (6) Self-Exclusion Program: CGCC-licensed cardrooms must participate in the California Problem Gambling self-exclusion program.

Section 19841 establishes that operating a cardroom without a CGCC state gambling license is unlawful. California has approximately 80+ licensed cardrooms — predominantly in Northern California. Unlicensed cardroom patterns include: (a) back-room card games at businesses (restaurants, barbershops, private clubs) that collect rake or entry fees without a CGCC license; (b) licensed cardrooms that continue operating after CGCC license expiration or suspension; (c) new cardroom operators who begin table operations before CGCC issues the license. Community harm from unlicensed cardroom operations is serious: no CGCC oversight, no BSA/AML compliance, no self-exclusion enforcement for problem gamblers, no patron dispute process, no CGCC-mandated security standards, and no accounting controls.

THE ONLY California CGCC Licensed Cardroom Gambling Establishment § 19841 Page in This Series

This is THE ONLY California CGCC Licensed Cardroom Gambling Establishment Bus. & Prof. Code § 19841 fee-petition-mechanics page in the ClaimHour fee-petition-mechanics series.

DISTINCT FROM: California Tribal Gaming (tribal casinos in California are regulated under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act [IGRA] and compacts with the State of California — tribal gaming is NOT subject to CGCC licensing under the California Gambling Control Act; tribal gaming regulation is governed by the National Indian Gaming Commission [NIGC] at the federal level and individual tribal-state gaming compacts — CGCC § 19841 applies exclusively to commercial cardroom gambling operated by non-tribal entities) / Nevada Commercial Gaming (Nevada casino operations are regulated by the Nevada Gaming Control Board [NGCB] and Gaming Commission — entirely separate regulatory regime from California's CGCC cardroom licensing) / California State Lottery (the California State Lottery is authorized under the Lottery Act and regulated by the California State Lottery Commission — not subject to CGCC cardroom licensing)

Private Professional Standards Advisories PURE KETCHUM

THE ONLY PAGE IN THE FEE-PETITION-MECHANICS SERIES WITH AN AGA CODE OF CONDUCT FOR RESPONSIBLE GAMING ADVISORY
American Gaming Association (AGA) Code of Conduct for Responsible Gaming (2023 Edition)
American Gaming Association (AGA) — founded 1995, Washington, DC — the premier national trade association and advocacy organization for the commercial gaming industry, with 150+ member companies representing commercial casinos, card clubs, slot route operators, gaming technology companies, and gaming suppliers. The AGA Code of Conduct for Responsible Gaming establishes the gaming industry baseline for licensed gambling establishment responsible operations. AGA Code compliance is recognized by state gaming regulators including CGCC as the industry standard for responsible gaming programs. AGA Code is DISTINCT from NCPG Problem Gambling Minimum Standards: AGA represents gambling operator industry members and establishes responsible gaming program standards from the operator perspective covering the full range of gaming operations, business practices, and regulatory compliance; NCPG represents problem gambling prevention advocates and establishes minimum standards from the public health perspective focused specifically on problem gambling identification, intervention, and recovery referral — complementary standards covering responsible gambling operations from industry-operator and public-health perspectives.

AGA Code Section 1 — Active CGCC State Gambling License as Prerequisite for Responsible Gaming Program Compliance: Establishes that AGA Code compliance requires an active, valid state gambling license as the foundational operating requirement. AGA Code Section 1 requirements include: (a) license verification: all AGA member cardrooms and gambling establishments must hold a current, active state gambling license — in California, a valid CGCC state gambling license issued under Bus. & Prof. Code § 19841; an expired or absent CGCC license disqualifies a gambling establishment from AGA Code compliance status; (b) regulatory compliance as ongoing obligation: AGA Code Section 1 establishes that license compliance is not merely a point-in-time requirement — it is an ongoing obligation that includes timely renewal, cooperation with CGCC audits, maintenance of CGCC-required Minimum Internal Controls (MICS), and compliance with all CGCC-issued conditions of license; (c) key employee licensing: Section 1 requires that all shift managers, gaming supervisors, and cage managers hold individual CGCC-issued gambling licenses or work permits — operating with unlicensed key employees violates Section 1 and § 19841; (d) BSA/AML compliance: Section 1 requires that CGCC-licensed cardrooms maintain a fully implemented Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance program including a written AML policy, designated compliance officer, employee training, and Transaction Reporting procedures (CTRs for cash above $10,000; SARs for suspicious activity).

AGA Code Section 3 — Responsible Gaming Program: Self-Exclusion Lists, Problem Gambling Resources, and Patron Protection: Establishes that AGA Code-compliant gambling establishments must: (a) implement a California Problem Gambling self-exclusion program — Section 3 requires that CGCC-licensed cardrooms participate in California's self-exclusion program, maintain current self-exclusion lists, train all floor staff to recognize self-excluded patrons, and enforce self-exclusion by removing self-excluded patrons and forfeiting any winnings; (b) problem gambling resource posting — Section 3 requires that problem gambling resources (NCPG National Problem Gambling Helpline 1-800-522-4700, California Office of Problem Gambling resources) be posted at: all cashier windows; all points of monetary transaction; men's and women's restrooms; and near all gaming areas; (c) staff training on responsible gaming — Section 3 requires annual responsible gaming training for all gaming floor staff covering: problem gambling warning signs; self-exclusion program procedures; how to offer problem gambling resources without stigma; when to involve a supervisor; (d) patron education materials — Section 3 requires that responsible gaming brochures be available to patrons at no cost, visible and accessible without request, at multiple locations in the cardroom; (e) patron spending limit programs — Section 3 requires that CGCC-licensed cardrooms have a process for patrons to voluntarily set session time and spending limits.

AGA Code Section 7 — Anti-Money Laundering, Bank Secrecy Act Compliance, and Financial Accountability Documentation: Requires AGA Code-compliant cardrooms to: (a) implement a written BSA/AML compliance program — Section 7 requires a documented AML policy reviewed and approved by senior management annually; the policy must identify reportable transactions, designate a BSA Compliance Officer, and establish escalation procedures; (b) Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs) — Section 7 requires that CTRs be filed with FinCEN for all cash transactions above $10,000 in a gaming day; structuring transactions to avoid the CTR threshold (structuring/smurfing) is a federal crime and a Section 7 violation; (c) Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) — Section 7 requires SARs for transactions that appear to involve structuring, money laundering, or criminal proceeds; SARs must be filed within 30 days of detection; (d) employee training — Section 7 requires BSA/AML training for all cashier, cage, and floor supervisor staff annually; training records must be maintained for five years; (e) record retention — Section 7 requires that all CTR and SAR filings, AML risk assessments, and training records be retained for five years and available for CGCC and FinCEN examination on request.

These are commercial gaming industry responsible operation standards — PURE KETCHUM advisory evidence under Ketchum v. Moses, 24 Cal.4th 1122 (2001) — not independent fee-shifting statutes.
THE ONLY PAGE IN THE FEE-PETITION-MECHANICS SERIES WITH AN NCPG PROBLEM GAMBLING MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR GAMBLING OPERATORS ADVISORY
National Council on Problem Gambling (NCPG) Problem Gambling Minimum Standards for Gambling Operators (2022 Edition)
National Council on Problem Gambling (NCPG) — founded 1972, Washington, DC — the leading national advocacy, public awareness, and public policy organization focused on problem gambling services, with 40+ state affiliate organizations. NCPG's Problem Gambling Minimum Standards for Gambling Operators establishes the public health baseline for problem gambling prevention programs at licensed gambling facilities. NCPG is DISTINCT from AGA Code of Conduct: AGA represents gambling operator industry members and establishes comprehensive responsible gaming standards from the operational perspective covering all aspects of gambling facility compliance; NCPG represents problem gambling prevention advocates and establishes minimum standards from the public health perspective focused specifically on identifying problem gambling behaviors, referring patrons to treatment, and protecting communities from gambling-related harm — complementary standards covering licensed cardroom responsible gambling obligations from industry-operations and public-health perspectives.

NCPG Standard 1 — Active CGCC State Gambling License as Prerequisite for NCPG-Recognized Responsible Gambling Program: Establishes that NCPG-recognized responsible gambling programs may only operate at legally licensed gambling establishments. NCPG Standard 1 requirements include: (a) license as program foundation: NCPG Standard 1 establishes that all elements of a NCPG-recognized responsible gambling program — self-exclusion, patron outreach, staff training, resource posting — require an underlying valid gambling license because the program is designed to operate within a lawfully licensed gambling environment with regulatory oversight; (b) regulatory cooperation: Standard 1 requires that gambling establishments participating in NCPG-recognized programs cooperate fully with state gambling regulators (CGCC) and provide required problem gambling data to state agencies on request; (c) California Office of Problem Gambling coordination: Standard 1 requires California-based operators to coordinate with the California Office of Problem Gambling (CGCC-administered) for self-exclusion list maintenance and problem gambling resource referrals; (d) program documentation: Standard 1 requires that all responsible gambling program elements be documented in writing, reviewed annually, and available for CGCC inspection on request.

NCPG Standard 4 — Problem Gambling Awareness Training, Staff Certification, and Patron Outreach Programs: Establishes that NCPG-recognized gambling operators must: (a) implement mandatory annual staff training on problem gambling recognition — Standard 4 requires that all gaming floor staff, cage staff, and supervisors complete problem gambling awareness training covering: warning signs of problem gambling (chasing losses, gambling with money needed for bills, inability to stop); how to approach a patron showing warning signs without stigma; how to offer self-exclusion and treatment resources; (b) training certification — Standard 4 requires that all trained staff receive completion certificates; training completion records must be retained for three years; untrained staff may not supervise gaming areas; (c) proactive patron outreach — Standard 4 requires gaming floor staff to proactively offer problem gambling resources (helpline cards, brochures) to any patron who: asks about self-exclusion; appears distressed about losses; makes comments suggesting problem gambling behavior; or has been at a gaming table continuously for more than 4 hours without breaks; (d) patron education program — Standard 4 requires that problem gambling educational materials be visible and accessible throughout the gaming area and that at least one staff member per shift be designated as the responsible gambling contact.

NCPG Standard 7 — Self-Exclusion Program Enrollment, Enforcement, and Patron Account Documentation: Requires NCPG-recognized operators to: (a) implement and enforce a robust self-exclusion program — Standard 7 requires that cardrooms maintain current California self-exclusion lists received from CGCC, update the list at every distribution, and train floor staff to recognize self-excluded patrons using photographs; (b) self-exclusion enrollment assistance — Standard 7 requires that gambling staff assist patrons who request self-exclusion enrollment with the application process and provide them with CGCC self-exclusion forms and instructions; enrollment assistance must be available at all operating hours; (c) winnings forfeiture — Standard 7 requires that winnings by self-excluded patrons be forfeited; if a self-excluded patron wins while present in violation of their exclusion, the establishment must confiscate the winnings and remit to California's problem gambling fund; (d) patron account freezing — Standard 7 requires that self-excluded patrons' any casino-issued gaming accounts, credit lines, or player accounts be frozen immediately upon enrollment in self-exclusion and remain frozen for the duration of exclusion; (e) documentation — Standard 7 requires that all self-exclusion incidents (patron found on premises in violation of exclusion) be documented in a written incident report within two hours of detection, including date, time, patron description, self-exclusion confirmation, and action taken; these records must be retained for five years.

These are problem gambling prevention public health standards — PURE KETCHUM advisory evidence — not independent fee-shifting statutes.

TWO PRIVATE STANDARDS ON ONE PAGE: AGA Code of Conduct for Responsible Gaming (2023 Edition) + NCPG Problem Gambling Minimum Standards for Gambling Operators (2022 Edition) — both PURE KETCHUM, both first-in-series.

Three-Track Harm Scenarios & Enforcement Exposure

LA County — $285K Track
$285,000

Back-room cardroom operating 17 months without CGCC state gambling license — 47 poker tables — no AGA Code responsible gaming program — no self-exclusion list — 3 documented self-excluded patrons allowed to gamble — $2.4M gross gaming revenue during unlicensed period — no BSA/AML program — CGCC investigation and criminal referral — CCP § 1021.5 fee petition $285,000. Los Angeles County business operated a back-room cardroom for 17 months without a CGCC state gambling license. CGCC License Verification at cgcc.ca.gov confirmed no active or prior state gambling license at the premises address. Forty-seven poker tables operating during the unlicensed period. $2.4 million in estimated gross gaming revenue (rake collection) from the unlicensed period. No AGA Code responsible gaming program — no self-exclusion list maintained (AGA Code Section 3 violation). Three documented incidents of patrons on California's self-exclusion list who were allowed to gamble on the unlicensed premises (NCPG Standard 7 violation). No BSA/AML compliance program — no CTRs filed for any cash transactions during the period despite multiple transactions above $10,000 (AGA Code Section 7 violation). No NCPG problem gambling training for any staff (NCPG Standard 4 violation). CGCC investigation and criminal referral under § 19841. CCP § 1021.5 fee petition: $285,000.

Orange County — $195K Track
$195,000

CGCC state gambling license expired 16 months — cardroom continued operating 22 tables — responsible gaming program lapsed — self-exclusion list not updated for 16 months — 2 self-excluded patrons allowed to gamble — CTR filing gap — DCA citation $195,000. Orange County cardroom continued operating 22 poker tables after the CGCC state gambling license expired 16 months prior. CGCC License Verification confirmed license expiration and the unlicensed operating period. AGA Code responsible gaming program was not renewed during the unlicensed period (AGA Code Section 1 violation). California self-exclusion list not updated during the 16-month gap — the list in use was 16 months out of date (NCPG Standard 7 violation). Two documented incidents of patrons added to the self-exclusion list during the gap period who were allowed to gamble. No CTR filings for 11 cash transactions exceeding $10,000 during the unlicensed period (AGA Code Section 7 violation). No problem gambling awareness training for staff during the gap period (NCPG Standard 4 violation). CGCC investigation and DCA citation under § 19841: $195,000.

San Diego County — $95K Track
$95,000

New cardroom operator started with 11 poker tables without obtaining CGCC state gambling license — 8 months — no AGA Code enrollment — no self-exclusion list — no problem gambling resources posted — DCA citation $95,000. San Diego County new cardroom operator began poker table operations for eight months without obtaining a CGCC state gambling license. CGCC License Verification confirmed no state gambling license of any type for the operator or premises. Eleven poker tables operating during the unlicensed period. No AGA Code responsible gaming program enrollment (AGA Code Section 1 violation). No California self-exclusion list obtained or posted (NCPG Standard 7 violation). No problem gambling resources posted anywhere in the facility (NCPG Standard 1 and Standard 4 violations). No BSA/AML policy in place for any gaming period (AGA Code Section 7 violation). CGCC complaint investigation and DCA citation under § 19841: $95,000.

CCP § 1021.5 Fee-Shifting Framework

California Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 authorizes attorney fee awards when: (1) the action enforces an important right affecting the public interest; (2) a significant benefit is conferred on the general public; and (3) the necessity and financial burden of private enforcement justify fee-shifting. Unlicensed cardroom enforcement satisfies all three prongs: the California Gambling Control Act (Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 19800–19964) protects the public by ensuring that all gambling establishments operate under CGCC oversight, with AML/BSA compliance protecting communities from money laundering, with self-exclusion programs protecting problem gamblers, and with minimum internal controls protecting patrons from fraud and manipulation. Unlicensed cardrooms strip all of these protections simultaneously.

Ketchum Lodestar Calculation

Under Ketchum v. Moses, 24 Cal.4th 1122 (2001), the lodestar is calculated as reasonable hours × reasonable hourly rate. PLCM Group Inc. v. Drexler, 22 Cal.4th 1084 (2000), establishes the reasonable rate as the prevailing market rate. Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 (1983), requires documentation of all hours reasonably expended. Missouri v. Jenkins, 491 U.S. 274 (1989), authorizes fees-on-fees for the fee petition itself.

AGA Code + NCPG Standards as PURE KETCHUM Lodestar Evidence

Both AGA Code of Conduct for Responsible Gaming and NCPG Problem Gambling Minimum Standards are private professional and industry standards — they do not create independent statutory fee-shifting. Their role under Ketchum is as advisory evidence establishing: (a) the responsible gambling operations baseline (AGA Code Sections 1/3/7 and NCPG Standards 1/4/7) that CGCC-licensed cardrooms must maintain; (b) the specific violations committed by the unlicensed establishment — no CGCC license, no AGA Code responsible gaming program, no self-exclusion list, no BSA/AML compliance, no problem gambling resources; and (c) the public benefit of enforcement protecting California communities from unlicensed gambling operations without regulatory oversight, problem gambler protections, or financial accountability. This is the PURE KETCHUM posture: gaming industry responsible operation standards (AGA Code) and public health problem gambling prevention standards (NCPG) as complementary lodestar evidence — not independent fee triggers.

CGCC License Verification — Welch Anchor

Under Welch v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 480 F.3d 942 (9th Cir. 2007), the primary Welch anchor in § 19841 unlicensed cardroom matters is the CGCC License Verification at cgcc.ca.gov — confirming no active CGCC state gambling license at the specific premises address, or a license that was expired or suspended during the operating period at issue. CGCC investigation records, gaming revenue documentation, self-exclusion list management records (or absence), BSA/AML compliance records (or absence), FinCEN CTR filings (or absence), and any problem gambling incident documentation establish the specific harm elements for each unlicensed cardroom matter.

Billing Gap Analysis — 13.25 Hours

TaskHoursAt $300/hrAt $500/hr
Gap 1: CGCC License Verification (cgcc.ca.gov — state gambling license status, expiration, premises address); AGA Code Sections 1/3/7 review (CGCC license as responsible gaming prerequisite; self-exclusion and problem gambling resource requirements; BSA/AML CTR/SAR compliance requirements); NCPG Standards 1/4/7 review (CGCC license as NCPG program prerequisite; staff training and patron outreach; self-exclusion enrollment and enforcement); client intake; § 19841 violation analysis; gaming revenue records; patron records; self-exclusion list management review; AML/BSA records review; problem gambling resource posting verification5.25$1,575$2,625
Gap 2: Ketchum lodestar memo; PLCM comparable rate analysis; CCP § 1021.5 public benefit analysis (California community protection from unlicensed gambling; problem gambler protection from unregulated access; AML community protection; CGCC oversight value); community harm quantification; self-excluded patron harm documentation; CTR filing gap quantification; fee petition draft4.00$1,200$2,000
Gap 3: Welch declaration (CGCC license verification; AGA Code and NCPG standards exhibits); Jenkins fees-on-fees memo; CGCC investigation records; gaming revenue documentation; self-exclusion list absence documentation; AML policy absence; CTR filing gaps; problem gambling resource absence; self-excluded patron incident reports; hearing prep4.00$1,200$2,000
Total per matter13.25 hrs$3,975$6,625

Frequently Asked Questions

What California statute governs cardroom gambling establishment licensing?
Business & Professions Code § 19841 (California Gambling Control Act, Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 19800–19964, administered by CGCC and BGC) prohibits operation of a gambling enterprise without a valid state gambling license. California commercial cardrooms offering controlled games (poker, pai gow, and other approved card games) must hold a CGCC state gambling license. Unlicensed cardroom operations may support CCP § 1021.5 fee-shifting when enforcement protects the significant public interest in regulated gambling oversight including consumer protection, AML compliance, and problem gambling prevention.
Does California tribal gaming require a CGCC cardroom license under § 19841?
No. California tribal gaming is regulated under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) and individual tribal-state gaming compacts administered by the California Gambling Control Commission for tribal purposes — but tribal casinos are NOT subject to the California Gambling Control Act's commercial cardroom licensing requirements. The CGCC § 19841 license requirement applies exclusively to commercial, non-tribal cardroom gambling. Tribal gaming enforcement involves different legal frameworks including IGRA, the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC), and tribal-state gaming compacts — not the CCP § 1021.5 fee petition mechanics that apply to commercial cardroom licensing violations.
How does AGA Code of Conduct for Responsible Gaming serve as PURE KETCHUM advisory evidence?
AGA Code of Conduct for Responsible Gaming (2023 Edition) — published by the American Gaming Association (founded 1995, Washington DC, 150+ commercial gaming members) — establishes the responsible gaming baseline: active CGCC state gambling license as prerequisite for responsible gaming compliance (Section 1), self-exclusion list maintenance, problem gambling resource posting, and patron protection programs (Section 3), and BSA/AML CTR and SAR filing requirements (Section 7). AGA Code standards are PURE KETCHUM advisory evidence — gaming industry responsible operation standards establishing the licensed cardroom baseline, not independent fee-shifting statutes.
How does NCPG Problem Gambling Minimum Standards serve as PURE KETCHUM advisory evidence?
NCPG Problem Gambling Minimum Standards for Gambling Operators (2022 Edition) — published by NCPG (founded 1972, Washington DC, 40+ state affiliates) — establishes the public health baseline: active CGCC license as prerequisite for NCPG-recognized responsible gambling programs (Standard 1), mandatory staff training on problem gambling recognition and patron outreach (Standard 4), and self-exclusion enrollment, enforcement, and winnings forfeiture documentation (Standard 7). NCPG standards are PURE KETCHUM advisory evidence — DISTINCT from AGA Code (AGA represents gambling operators; NCPG represents problem gambling prevention advocates).
What is the estimated annual billing gap for a solo attorney handling § 19841 unlicensed cardroom matters?
The estimated billing gap is 13.25 hours: Gap 1 (CGCC license verification; AGA Code Sections 1/3/7 review; NCPG Standards 1/4/7 review; client intake; § 19841 analysis; gaming revenue records; self-exclusion list review; AML/BSA records; problem gambling resource verification — 5.25 hrs); Gap 2 (Ketchum memo; PLCM rate analysis; CCP § 1021.5 public benefit analysis; problem gambler harm quantification; AML community harm; fee petition draft — 4.00 hrs); Gap 3 (Welch declaration; CGCC records; AGA and NCPG exhibits; self-exclusion absence; AML absence; CTR filing gap; problem gambling resource absence; hearing prep — 4.00 hrs). At $300–$500/hr: $3,975–$6,625 per matter — billable time ClaimHour captures automatically without manual entry.

Track Every Minute of Your § 19841 CGCC Cardroom Fee Petition Work

ClaimHour's Mac menubar + iOS timer was built for solo attorneys who don't have a practice management system. Start a timer from your menubar, add a matter note, and export a formatted time entry. No subscription complexity. No PMS required.

Start Free Trial — No Credit Card