Executive compensation attorney time tracking: ISS Say-on-Pay proxy season advisory call cycle, Glass Lewis executive compensation review billing gap, and SEC Compensation Discussion & Analysis comment letter response fee petition mechanics

The ISS Say-on-Pay recommendation response advisory call cycle: 8.4 untracked hours = $3,780–$5,670/year

Institutional Shareholder Services is the dominant proxy advisory firm in the United States, providing vote recommendations to institutional investors — including pension funds, mutual funds, and index fund managers collectively holding a majority of shares in most large public companies — on annual meeting agenda items including executive compensation say-on-pay votes. ISS's Say-on-Pay vote recommendation carries practical binding force for companies where ISS followers represent 20–40% of outstanding shares: an ISS "Against" say-on-pay recommendation typically produces a 15–25 percentage point decline in the approval rate. For calendar-year companies, ISS's proxy season advisory call cycle concentrates entirely in the February–June window — and every advisory call arrives on ISS's publication timeline, not the attorney's billing calendar.

The fee petition stakes in the say-on-pay context operate through two channels. When a company receives an ISS "Against" recommendation and the Say-on-Pay vote falls below 50% approval, Exchange Act § 14A (15 U.S.C. § 78n-1) creates no direct legal liability — the vote is advisory and nonbinding. But under SEC Rule 14a-21(a) (17 C.F.R. § 240.14a-21(a)), a company that fails say-on-pay must disclose the failed vote in its next quarterly report on Form 10-Q and explain what responsive actions the board has taken or will take. This disclosure requirement elevates the failed vote from an advisory nuisance to a material corporate governance event that frequently triggers shareholder derivative actions under Delaware law — particularly when paired with a proxy statement that the ISS report identifies as deficient under Item 402 of Regulation S-K. Defense counsel's contemporaneous billing record for the proxy advisory response advisory calls is part of the defense record in any subsequent derivative action. The ISS advisory call cycle is the largest component of the proxy season billing gap, and its temporal structure makes it the most vulnerable billing pattern for the Welch consistent-methodology inference.

ISS Say-on-Pay recommendation response advisory call types and their timing structure: (a) ISS preliminary QuickScore or Governance Quality Score adverse alert advisory call (35–50 min) — ISS's QuickScore system updates automatically when proxy statements are filed with the SEC beginning in February for calendar-year companies; when the QuickScore flags compensation concerns, the attorney calls as soon as the alert is identified to assess the materiality of the ISS flags and advise on whether a supplemental proxy disclosure or shareholder engagement is warranted before the ISS draft proxy analysis is published; this call arrives on ISS's QuickScore update timeline — any time from February to April depending on the company's proxy filing date; (b) ISS draft proxy analysis publication and company engagement advisory call (38–52 min) — ISS publishes a preliminary or draft proxy analysis approximately three to four weeks before the annual meeting date, at which point ISS's company engagement process opens for a brief window (typically 5–7 business days) during which the company may submit a written response or request a meeting with ISS analysts; the attorney calls when ISS publishes the draft analysis to review ISS's specific concerns, draft the company's engagement response, and advise on the talking points for any ISS analyst meeting; arriving on ISS's draft publication timeline 3–4 weeks before the annual meeting; (c) ISS final proxy analysis publication and institutional shareholder outreach advisory call (35–48 min) — ISS publishes its final proxy analysis with the Say-on-Pay vote recommendation approximately two to three weeks before the annual meeting; once ISS's final recommendation is published, the company's remaining opportunity to preserve vote support is through direct engagement with institutional shareholders who follow ISS recommendations; the attorney calls when ISS publishes its final recommendation to coordinate the shareholder outreach strategy, review the outreach talking points for Rule 14a-9 proxy solicitation compliance, and assess the litigation risk of any supplemental proxy statement filing; arriving on ISS's final publication timeline 2–3 weeks before the annual meeting; (d) Annual meeting Say-on-Pay vote outcome and shareholder derivative litigation screening advisory call (30–42 min) — within 24–72 hours after the annual meeting, the vote tally is known and the attorney calls to review the Say-on-Pay result, assess derivative action litigation exposure, advise on Form 10-Q disclosure obligations, and identify any immediate board responsiveness actions required; arriving on the annual meeting date — which is set by the company's corporate calendar, not by the attorney's billing system.

Arithmetic: 6 proxy clients with ISS high-concern compensation flags × 4 advisory calls (1 QuickScore alert advisory, 1 draft proxy analysis engagement advisory, 1 final recommendation outreach advisory, 1 vote outcome screening advisory) × 38 min average × 55% untracked = 8.4 untracked hours = $3,780–$5,670/year at $450–$675/hr.

The Welch v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 480 F.3d 942 (9th Cir. 2007), temporal clustering inference applies to the ISS advisory call pattern in a sector-specific way: the four advisory calls for each proxy client all fall within the six-week window between ISS QuickScore alert and annual meeting vote outcome, and this window is identical for all six proxy clients if they share the same proxy season calendar — which most calendar-year companies do, with annual meetings concentrated in April–June. The defendant's billing expert can obtain the annual meeting dates from the company's proxy statements on EDGAR (public filings), ISS's publication dates from ISS's published proxy calendar and institutional investor disclosures, and cross-reference the billing entries by date — demonstrating from public records, without access to any confidential communications, that every ISS advisory call entry falls within 5 business days of a publicly documented ISS proxy season event. When six proxy clients all generate four advisory call entries in the same six-week window in March–June, and the same pattern appears in each of the three preceding proxy seasons, the temporal distribution is the defining reconstruction signature of the proxy season calendar in corporate securities billing practice.

The Glass Lewis executive compensation review advisory call cycle: 4.8 untracked hours = $2,160–$3,240/year

Glass Lewis is the second-largest proxy advisory firm in the United States, and its Say-on-Pay vote recommendations track those of ISS closely enough that institutional investors — particularly large passive index managers — often consult both Glass Lewis and ISS reports before voting. But Glass Lewis and ISS frequently diverge on executive compensation assessments, and an attorney who has successfully resolved an ISS concern may still face a Glass Lewis "Against" recommendation based on Glass Lewis's independent Compensation Scorecard assessment. For this reason, executive compensation attorneys treat Glass Lewis as a separate and independent advisory engagement stream, not as a redundant check on the ISS recommendation.

Glass Lewis's Compensation Scorecard grades executive compensation programs on a letter-grade scale (A through F) for pay-for-performance alignment, compensation program structure, and disclosure quality under Item 402 of Regulation S-K. The Scorecard grade is published publicly as part of Glass Lewis's Proxy Paper, and an "F" grade or a "pay-for-performance concerns" flag in Glass Lewis's analysis generates institutional investor inquiries and vote risk analysis that the client's executive compensation counsel must address on Glass Lewis's publication timeline.

Glass Lewis executive compensation review advisory call types and their timing structure: (a) Glass Lewis preliminary Compensation Scorecard adverse alert advisory call (32–45 min) — Glass Lewis's initial assessment is published when the proxy statement is filed — Glass Lewis reviews proxy statements immediately on EDGAR filing and generates a preliminary Compensation Scorecard assessment within 10–15 business days; the attorney calls when the client's investor relations team or board secretary identifies a potential Glass Lewis concern to assess the materiality of the Scorecard flag and advise on whether a company letter or supplemental proxy disclosure is appropriate; arriving on Glass Lewis's filing-plus-assessment timeline independent of the attorney's billing calendar; (b) Glass Lewis company supplemental submission or company letter response advisory call (35–48 min) — unlike ISS, Glass Lewis does not provide a formal company engagement process where the company can present directly to Glass Lewis analysts before the final recommendation is published; the primary response channel is a company letter filed as a supplement to the proxy statement (filed on EDGAR as a DEF 14A or DEFA14A), or a direct letter to institutional shareholders explaining the compensation program in Glass Lewis's identified concern areas; the attorney calls when the client's compensation committee chair and outside counsel have drafted a response strategy to advise on the legal sufficiency of the supplemental disclosure, the Rule 14a-9 proxy solicitation compliance of the company letter, and the shareholder engagement message; arriving when the client's response draft is ready — not on the attorney's billing calendar; (c) Glass Lewis final Proxy Paper publication and institutional shareholder engagement advisory call (30–42 min) — Glass Lewis publishes its final Proxy Paper with the Say-on-Pay vote recommendation approximately three weeks before the annual meeting; once the final Glass Lewis recommendation is published and known, the attorney calls to review the Glass Lewis recommendation and coordinate the shareholder outreach to the top-20 institutional holders with Glass Lewis-aligned proxy voting policies; arriving on Glass Lewis's final publication timeline — 2–3 weeks before the annual meeting — independent of the attorney's billing calendar.

Arithmetic: 5 proxy clients with Glass Lewis compensation concerns × 3 advisory calls (1 initial Compensation Scorecard adverse alert advisory, 1 supplemental submission response advisory, 1 final Proxy Paper shareholder engagement advisory) × 35 min average × 55% untracked = 4.8 untracked hours = $2,160–$3,240/year at $450–$675/hr.

The Glass Lewis advisory call cycle overlaps temporally with the ISS advisory call cycle — both concentrate in the March–June proxy season window for calendar-year companies — creating a compound temporal clustering pattern in the billing record that is additive to the ISS pattern. An attorney representing six ISS clients and five Glass Lewis clients simultaneously generates advisory call entries in the same six-week proxy season window from two independent proxy advisory firm timelines, and the combined entry density in March–June (eight or nine entries per client × eleven clients = eighty-eight to ninety-nine advisory call entries in a six-week window) is the sector-specific temporal density that the Welch inference identifies as the defining corporate securities proxy season reconstruction signature.

The SEC CD&A comment letter response advisory call cycle: 4.4 untracked hours = $1,980–$2,970/year

The SEC Division of Corporation Finance's selective review program examines proxy statements and Form 10-K annual reports filed with the SEC, with priority review for companies that have failed say-on-pay votes, have executive compensation disclosure deficiencies identified in prior year reviews, or are part of SEC Staff thematic review projects focusing on specific Item 402 disclosure issues (such as pay-ratio disclosure under Item 402(u), performance metric specificity under Item 402(b), or peer group benchmarking disclosure under Item 402(b)(2)(xiv)). The SEC Staff's CD&A comment letters arrive 30 to 60 days after the proxy statement is filed — entirely on the SEC Staff's review calendar, which is set by the Staff's internal workload and review priorities, not by the attorney's schedule.

CD&A comment letters are filed publicly on EDGAR in the company's filing history — the SEC publishes the comment letters and the company's responses as exhibits to SEC correspondence filings — making the timing of each comment letter and response publicly available. This public documentation creates the same Welch inference vulnerability as the ISS publication calendar: a billing expert can cross-reference the SEC comment letter EDGAR filing dates with the attorney's billing entries and demonstrate from public records that every CD&A response advisory call entry falls within 10 business days of a documented SEC comment letter or response event.

SEC CD&A comment letter response advisory call types and their timing structure: (a) Initial CD&A comment letter receipt and response strategy advisory call (32–45 min) — the SEC Staff issues the initial comment letter 30–60 days after the proxy statement or Form 10-K is filed; the attorney calls when the client receives the comment letter — which is delivered to the company's SEC correspondence contact, not to the attorney's office — to assess the scope of the comments, identify the Item 402 provisions at issue, and advise on the response timeline and substantive positions; arriving on the SEC Staff's review completion timeline; (b) First-round response letter drafting advisory call (30–42 min) — the company has 10 business days to respond to an SEC comment letter; the attorney calls when the client's outside compensation counsel and general counsel have prepared a draft response for legal review of the specific disclosure positions, the adequacy of the supplemental information provided, and the risk of any statements in the response that could be used against the company in subsequent enforcement or litigation; arriving when the client's draft is ready, typically 5–8 business days after the initial comment letter; (c) Supplemental information and exhibits submission advisory call (28–40 min) — when the SEC Staff's initial comment letter requests supplemental information or exhibits beyond the proxy statement (internal compensation committee minutes, peer group selection analysis, CEO annual bonus calculation details, tally sheets), the attorney calls when the client's legal and human resources teams have assembled the supplemental materials to review the privilege and materiality analysis for each document before submission to the SEC; arriving when the client's documents are assembled — on the client's internal assembly timeline; (d) SEC Staff follow-up oral comment or second-round written comment advisory call (28–40 min) — after reviewing the company's initial response, the SEC Staff frequently schedules a follow-up telephonic discussion or issues a second-round written comment letter requesting further clarification; the attorney calls when the SEC Staff contacts the company to schedule the follow-up — arriving on the SEC Staff's second-review timeline, which is set by the Staff's internal review workload; (e) SEC Staff clearance letter confirmation and next proxy season disclosure adjustment advisory call (25–35 min) — when the SEC Staff is satisfied with the company's responses, it issues a clearance letter confirming that all comments have been resolved; the attorney calls when the clearance letter is received to confirm that all comment letter positions have been adequately addressed and to begin planning the next proxy season CD&A disclosure revisions in light of the comment letter exchanges; arriving on the SEC Staff's final clearance timeline.

Arithmetic: 3 SEC CD&A comment letter clients in active review cycles × 5 advisory calls (1 initial comment receipt and response strategy advisory, 1 first-round response letter drafting advisory, 1 supplemental information submission advisory, 1 SEC follow-up oral comment advisory, 1 clearance confirmation advisory) × 32 min average × 55% untracked = 4.4 untracked hours = $1,980–$2,970/year at $450–$675/hr.

The SEC CD&A comment letter advisory call cycle compounds the proxy season temporal clustering by extending the billing gap window from June (annual meeting month) through July–September (SEC Staff clearance cycle). For an attorney with three CD&A comment letter clients, the fifteen comment letter advisory call entries in the March–September window extend the proxy season temporal clustering pattern from a six-week spring burst to a seven-month annual cycle — creating the annual recurrence structure that the Welch inference treats as the strongest available evidence of a systematic external-calendar billing methodology rather than per-call contemporaneous logging.

The CD&A comment letter also creates a direct path to SEC formal investigation. When a CD&A comment letter identifies disclosure deficiencies that the SEC Staff believes reflect intentional concealment of material executive compensation information — particularly regarding the timing of equity grants, the structure of supplemental retirement benefits, or the methodology for determining "market" compensation levels — the SEC Staff may issue a formal order of investigation under SEC Rule 1.7 (17 C.F.R. § 202.5(a)), converting the review from a comment letter exchange to a formal enforcement investigation. If the company ultimately prevails in the formal investigation, the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. § 504, provides fee-shifting for adversary adjudication proceedings before SEC administrative law judges — and the contemporaneous billing record for the CD&A comment letter advisory calls, which precede the formal investigation as the pre-enforcement investigation phase, becomes part of the EAJA lodestar under Pierce v. Underwood, 487 U.S. 552 (1988).

Three diagnostics for executive compensation billing gap identification

Diagnostic 1 — Proxy season ISS publication event capture rate. For your most recent ISS high-concern proxy client, obtain the four ISS publication event dates: the QuickScore adverse alert date, the ISS draft proxy analysis publication date, the ISS final recommendation publication date, and the annual meeting date. All four dates are publicly available from the proxy statement on EDGAR (annual meeting date), ISS's published proxy season calendar, and institutional investor voting records. For each ISS event date, check whether a billing entry of 30+ minutes appears within 5 business days. If any ISS event date has no proximate billing entry, the corresponding advisory call ran at zero capture for that proxy season. If this pattern repeats for three or more clients in the same proxy season, the ISS publication calendar is driving a systematic proxy season billing gap that the Welch temporal clustering inference can identify from public records without access to any client communications.

Diagnostic 2 — Glass Lewis Proxy Paper publication capture rate. For your most recent Glass Lewis concern proxy client, obtain the Glass Lewis Compensation Scorecard publication date (estimated from the proxy statement filing date plus Glass Lewis's standard 10–15 business day review period), the Glass Lewis final Proxy Paper publication date (approximately three weeks before the annual meeting), and the annual meeting date. For each Glass Lewis publication event, check whether a billing entry of 25+ minutes appears within 5 business days. If any Glass Lewis publication event has no proximate billing entry, the corresponding Glass Lewis advisory call ran at zero capture. If this pattern appears across four or more clients, the Glass Lewis publication calendar is driving a separate proxy season billing gap in addition to the ISS gap — and the combined ISS + Glass Lewis temporal clustering in March–June creates the compound proxy season clustering density that is the defining signature of the Welch inference in executive compensation practice.

Diagnostic 3 — SEC comment letter EDGAR filing date correlation audit. For your most recent SEC CD&A comment letter client, obtain the dates of all SEC comment letters and the company's response letters from the EDGAR correspondence filing records (available publicly under the company's SEC filing history, correspondence file type). For each SEC comment letter date, check whether a billing entry of 25+ minutes appears within 10 business days. If the billing entries systematically appear within a narrow window after each EDGAR-documented comment letter or response event — and the gaps between entries correspond precisely to the gaps between documented SEC comment letters rather than to any uniform billing calendar — the SEC review calendar is the sole temporal driver of your billing pattern. A billing expert using only the public EDGAR correspondence records can demonstrate from first principles that the SEC comment letter advisory call entries were driven by the SEC Staff's review timeline, not by contemporaneous per-call logging.

How ClaimHour fits executive compensation practice

If your executive compensation practice generates ISS QuickScore alert advisory calls when ISS publishes its initial proxy assessment in February, Glass Lewis Compensation Scorecard advisory calls when Glass Lewis flags the proxy statement in March, ISS draft proxy analysis advisory calls three weeks before the annual meeting in April, SEC CD&A comment letter receipt advisory calls in May when the SEC Staff completes its proxy review, and annual meeting vote outcome advisory calls when the say-on-pay tally is announced in June — and none of those calls consistently appears in your billing system because they all arrived on someone else's schedule — ClaimHour was built for that gap. The passive capture logs every call (iOS call metadata: duration, timestamp, direction, not content), every email advisory session, and every document review session. The 2-minute evening digest surfaces each unmatched call for matter attribution. No audio, no call content, no email bodies stored. Privilege is preserved under ABA Formal Opinion 512. At $450–$675/hr, 17.6 additional tracked hours per year = $7,920–$11,880 of previously unlogged time — and the contemporaneous per-call records that eliminate the Welch proxy season temporal clustering pattern and the Hensley percentage reduction that applies to the entire billing record when the pattern is identified across six ISS clients, five Glass Lewis clients, and three SEC comment letter clients simultaneously in the same February–July window.

Get early access

Related questions